Microjet Configuration Sensitivities for Active Flow Control on Multi-Element High-Lift Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Hosseini, Seyedeh Sheida [1 ]
Cooperman, Aubryn [2 ]
van Dam, C. P. [2 ]
Pandya, Shishir A. [1 ]
机构
[1] NASA Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2021年 / 58卷 / 04期
关键词
LOAD CONTROL; GURNEY; FLAP;
D O I
10.2514/1.C035986
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Various characteristics of small surface-normal jets (microjets) located on a flap's pressure-side near the trailing edge are investigated as an active aerodynamic load control technology for multi-element high-lift systems. Two-dimensional computational studies are carried out to investigate the sensitivity of microjet aerodynamic effectiveness to configuration. Initially, the effects of microjet location and width are explored. The study shows that lift enhancement decreases as the microjet is moved forward from the trailing edge, and that wider microjets are more effective in lift enhancement and drag reduction, whereas thinner microjets are more efficient. Microjet exit velocity profile effect on the integrated forces is also studied, and the effects are shown to be insignificant. To gain preliminary insight of the microjet system requirements, several plenum configurations are studied, and a preliminary analysis of the power requirements to supply the air mass flow is presented. Next, the study is extended to a geometry with moderate trailing edge separation to demonstrate microjet's separation mitigation capability. To gain better understanding of the system requirements, pulsed versus continuous microjets are examined, and it is found that pulsed blowing causes a breakdown of the favorable effect of the microjet on the trailing edge flow and therefore reduces the circulation control effectiveness of the microjet.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 761
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the potential of numerical optimization of high-lift multi-element airfoils based on the solution of the Navier-Stokes-equations
    Wild, J
    COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS 2002, 2003, : 267 - 272
  • [42] Computational Investigation of Conventional and Active-Flow-Control-Enabled High-Lift Configurations
    Vatsa, Veer N.
    Lin, John C.
    Melton, Latunia P.
    Lockard, David P.
    Ferris, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2021, 58 (05): : 1137 - 1153
  • [43] Numerical Study of Flow Control on Simplified High-Lift
    Goffert, B.
    Silva, R. G.
    Francisco, C. P. F.
    Reis, M. L. C. C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 16 (04) : 634 - 654
  • [44] Combined Active Separation Control on the Leading Edge and on the Trailing Edge Flap of a Slatless High-Lift Configuration
    Haucke, Frank
    Bauer, Matthias
    Nitsche, Wolfgang
    NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 : 215 - 225
  • [45] Numerical simulation of active stall control on high-lift airfoil
    Han, Zhonghua
    Song, Wenping
    Qiao, Zhide
    Jisuan Wuli/Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 26 (06): : 837 - 841
  • [46] A two-element high-lift airfoil in disturbed flow conditions
    Klein S.
    Scholz P.
    Radespiel R.
    CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2017, 8 (1) : 79 - 91
  • [47] System-Level Assessment of Active Flow Control for Commercial Aircraft High-Lift Devices
    Cai, Yu
    Gao, Zhenyu
    Chakraborty, Imon
    Briceno, Simon
    Mavris, Dimitri N.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2018, 55 (03): : 1200 - 1216
  • [48] Detailed Characterisation, using PIV, of the Flow around an Airfoil in High-Lift Configuration
    Arnott, A
    Schneider, G
    Neitzke, KP
    Agocs, J
    Schröder, A
    Sammler, B
    Kompenhans, J
    PARTICLE IMAGE VELOCIMETRY: RECENT IMPROVEMENTS, 2004, : 31 - 42
  • [49] Zonal-detached-eddy simulation of the flow around a high-lift configuration
    Deck, S
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2005, 43 (11) : 2372 - 2384
  • [50] Global Stability Analysis of a Compressible Turbulent Flow Around a High-Lift Configuration
    Iorio, M. C.
    Gonzalez, L. M.
    Martinez-Cava, A.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (02) : 373 - 385