Gravitational-wave astrophysics with effective-spin measurements: Asymmetries and selection biases

被引:90
|
作者
Ng, Ken K. Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vitale, Salvatore [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zimmerman, Aaron [4 ]
Chatziioannou, Katerina [4 ]
Gerosa, Davide [5 ]
Haster, Carl-Johan [4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, LIGO, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Phys, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Kavli Inst Astrophys & Space Res, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Canadian Inst Theoret Astrophys, 60 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada
[5] CALTECH, TAPIR 350-17,1200 E Calif Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COMPACT BINARIES; BLACK-HOLES; STAR; EVOLUTION; MERGERS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.98.083007
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Gravitational waves emitted by coalescing compact objects carry information about the spin of the individual bodies. However, with present detectors only the mass-weighted combination of the components of the spin along the orbital angular momentum can be measured accurately. This quantity, the effective spin chi(eff), is conserved up to at least the second post-Newtonian order. The measured distribution of chi(eff) values from a population of detected binaries, and in particular whether this distribution is symmetric about zero, encodes valuable information about the underlying compact-binary formation channels. In this paper we focus on two important complications of using the effective spin to study astrophysical population properties: (i) an astrophysical distribution for chi(eff) values which is symmetric does not necessarily lead to a symmetric distribution for the detected effective spin values, leading to a selection bias; and (ii) the posterior distribution of chi(eff) for individual events is asymmetric and it cannot usually be treated as a Gaussian. We find that the posterior distributions for chi(eff) systematically show fatter tails toward larger positive values, unless the total mass is large or the mass ratio m(2)/m(1) is smaller than similar to 1/2. Finally we show that uncertainties in the measurement of chi(eff) are systematically larger when the true value is negative than when it is positive. All these factors can bias astrophysical inference about the population when we have more than similar to 100 events and should be taken into account when using gravitational-wave measurements to characterize astrophysical populations.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inflationary gravitational-wave background and measurements of the scalar spectral index
    Smith, Tristan L.
    Kamionkowski, Marc
    Cooray, Asantha
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2008, 78 (08):
  • [42] Improved effective-one-body model of spinning, nonprecessing binary black holes for the era of gravitational-wave astrophysics with advanced detectors
    Bohe, Alejandro
    Shao, Lijing
    Taracchini, Andrea
    Buonanno, Alessandra
    Babak, Stanislav
    Harry, Ian W.
    Hinder, Ian
    Ossokine, Serguei
    Puerrer, Michael
    Raymond, Vivien
    Chu, Tony
    Fong, Heather
    Kumar, Prayush
    Pfeiffer, Harald P.
    Boyle, Michael
    Hemberger, Daniel A.
    Kidder, Lawrence E.
    Lovelace, Geoffrey
    Scheel, Mark A.
    Szilagyi, Bela
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2017, 95 (04)
  • [43] The Binary-Host Connection: Astrophysics of Gravitational-Wave Binaries from Host Galaxy Properties
    Adhikari, Susmita
    Fishbach, Maya
    Holz, Daniel E.
    Wechsler, Risa H.
    Fang, Zhanpei
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 905 (01):
  • [44] Erratum: Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors (vol 107, 064056, 2023)
    Grant, Alexander M.
    Nichols, David A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 108 (02)
  • [45] Stochastic gravitational-wave background from spin loss of black holes
    Fan, Xi-Long
    Chen, Yanbei
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2018, 98 (04)
  • [46] Eccentricity or spin precession? Distinguishing subdominant effects in gravitational-wave data
    Romero-Shaw, Isobel M.
    Gerosa, Davide
    Loutrel, Nicholas
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 519 (04) : 5352 - 5357
  • [47] Gravitational-wave selection effects using neural-network classifiers
    Gerosa, Davide
    Pratten, Geraint
    Vecchio, Alberto
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (10)
  • [48] Phenomenological gravitational-wave model for precessing black-hole binaries with higher multipoles and asymmetries
    Thompson, Jonathan E.
    Hamilton, Eleanor
    London, Lionel
    Ghosh, Shrobana
    Kolitsidou, Panagiota
    Hoy, Charlie
    Hannam, Mark
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2024, 109 (06)
  • [49] Probing Supermassive Black Hole Seed Scenarios with Gravitational-wave Measurements
    Ellis, John
    Fairbairn, Malcolm
    Urrutia, Juan
    Vaskonen, Ville
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 964 (01):
  • [50] Potential biases and prospects for the Hubble constant estimation via electromagnetic and gravitational-wave joint analyses
    Gianfagna, Giulia
    Piro, Luigi
    Pannarale, Francesco
    Van Eerten, Hendrik
    Ricci, Fulvio
    Ryan, Geoffrey
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 528 (02) : 2600 - 2613