A comparison of quality control methods for active coating processes

被引:36
|
作者
Brock, D. [1 ]
Zeitler, J. A. [2 ]
Funke, A. [3 ]
Knop, K. [1 ]
Kleinebudde, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Pharmaceut & Biopharmaceut, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Chem Engn & Biotechnol, Cambridge CB2 3RA, England
[3] Bayer Pharma AG, Global Chem & Pharmaceut Dev, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Terahertz pulsed imaging; Active coating; Coating thickness; Pan coating; Optical microscopy; REAL-TIME; TERAHERTZ; SPECTROSCOPY; THICKNESS; OPERATION; PAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.09.021
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Terahertz pulsed imaging (TPI) is a recent and nondestructive technique to quantify coating thickness of pharmaceutical tablet film coatings. In this study, TPI is used for the first time to quantify the progress of an active coating process. The dosage form consisted of a push-pull osmotic system comprising a two-layer tablet core with a functional film coating and a laser drilled hole. On top of this system an active coating was applied. The coating thickness data acquired by TPI and optical microscopy was compared to the quantification of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) via HPLC. Good correlation of TPI and HPLC data was shown for coating thicknesses up to 500 mu m. Due to the special structure of the dosage form, the TPI detection limit of 38 mu m layer thickness was circumvented by analysing the coating thickness of active coating and functional subcoat in one. Therefore it was possible to monitor the active coating process from the very beginning of the process. Optical microscopy was no suitable reference technique for TPI thickness measurements. The active coating showed deformation artefacts during sample preparation, which biased the subsequent thickness measurements. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 295
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of methods for NGS library quality control and quantification
    Papic, Bojan
    Kuhar, Urska
    Kusar, Darja
    SLOVENIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2016, 53 : 124 - 128
  • [12] A comparison of quality control methods applied to carotid endarterectomy
    Gaunt, ME
    Smith, JL
    Ratliff, DA
    Bell, PRF
    Naylor, AR
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 11 (01) : 4 - 11
  • [13] Comparison of Voltage Control Methods for Incrementing Active Power Production
    Calderaro, V.
    Galdi, V.
    Graditi, G.
    Lamberti, F.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONFERENCE (ENERGYCON 2014), 2014, : 1091 - 1098
  • [14] Statistical methods for comparison to placebo in active-control trials
    Hasselblad, V
    Kong, DF
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2001, 35 (02): : 435 - 449
  • [15] Statistical Methods for Comparison to Placebo in Active-Control Trials
    Vic Hasselblad
    David F. Kong
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2001, 35 (2): : 435 - 449
  • [16] Environmental comparison of metal coating processes
    Kellens, Karel
    Paraskevas, Dimos
    Dewulf, Wim
    Duflou, Joost R.
    22ND CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING, 2015, 29 : 420 - 425
  • [17] Comparison of the compensation quality for active power filter control techniques
    Tugay, Dmitry
    Kolontaievskyi, Yurii
    Korneliuk, Serhii
    Akymov, Valentyn
    2020 IEEE KHPI WEEK ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY (KHPI WEEK), 2020, : 236 - 241
  • [18] Effect of process parameters on coating quality in surface coating processes
    Jou, M
    Lo, CC
    PROGRESS ON ADVANCED MANUFACTURE FOR MICRO/NANO TECHNOLOGY 2005, PT 1 AND 2, 2006, 505-507 : 1033 - 1038
  • [19] Quality Control of Heparin Injections: Comparison of Four Established Methods
    Natalia A. Burmistrova
    Bernd W. K. Diehl
    Polina M. Soboleva
    Ekaterina Rubtsova
    Eugene A. Legin
    Andrey V. Legin
    Dmitry O. Kirsanov
    Yulia B. Monakhova
    Analytical Sciences, 2020, 36 : 1467 - 1471
  • [20] Quality Control of Heparin Injections: Comparison of Four Established Methods
    Burmistrova, Natalia A.
    Diehl, Bernd W. K.
    Soboleva, Polina M.
    Rubtsova, Ekaterina
    Legin, Eugene A.
    Legin, Andrey, V
    Kirsanov, Dmitry O.
    Monakhova, Yulia B.
    ANALYTICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 36 (12) : 1467 - 1472