The Language of Science and Social Licence to Operate

被引:18
|
作者
Gallois, Cindy [1 ]
Ashworth, Peta [1 ,2 ]
Leach, Joan [3 ,4 ]
Moffat, Kieren [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Psychol & Commun, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sustainable Energy Futures, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Commun, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] CSIRO, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
social licence to operate; science communication; communication accommodation theory; energy; communities; COMMUNICATION; ACCEPTANCE; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0261927X16663254
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social licence to operate (SLO) is an informal agreement that infers ongoing acceptance of an industrial or energy project by a local community and the stakeholders affected by it. Negotiation of SLOs centrally implicates language and communication, including scientific language and concepts. We first review the literature about the definition and communicative features of SLOs, and their relation to scientific communication. We describe communication accommodation theory and the ways that it can help understand (un)successful SLO negotiation, and describe examples of texts that show accommodative or nonaccommodative language around SLOs. We summarize some results which help indicate different ways of accommodating communities in the negotiation of SLOs. Finally, we describe a research agenda on communication accommodation and SLOs, in the service of improving their impact on energy, the environment, and the transfer of science.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 60
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Renewable energy, social disruption and formalising the social licence to operate in South Africa
    Mabele, Bernard
    Marais, Lochner
    Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye
    Mirzania, Pegah
    Mbobo, Babalwa
    van der Watt, Phia
    Cloete, Jan
    Venter, Anita
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (01) : 331 - 343
  • [32] Maori and mining: Indigenous perspectives on reconceptualising and contextualising the social licence to operate
    Ruckstuhl, Katharina
    Thompson-Fawcett, Michelle
    Rae, Hauauru
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2014, 32 (04) : 304 - 314
  • [33] Perceptions of the 'good farmer' and social licence to operate in Aotearoa New Zealand
    Booth, Pamela L.
    Espig, Martin
    Kirk, Nicholas
    Sinner, Jim
    Campbell, Hugh
    Edwards, Peter
    Kannemeyer, Robyn
    Dear, Chloe
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND, 2024,
  • [34] Social Licence for Marine Conservation Science
    Kelly, Rachel
    Fleming, Aysha
    Pecl, Gretta T.
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2018, 5
  • [35] In the shadows of social licence to operate: Untold investment grievances in latin America
    Ehrnstrom-Fuentes, Maria
    Kroger, Markus
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 141 : 346 - 358
  • [36] An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry
    Prno, Jason
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2013, 38 (04) : 577 - 590
  • [37] Professional standards and the social licence to operate: a panacea for finance or an exercise in symbolism?
    O'Brien, Justin
    Gilligan, George
    Roberts, Alex
    McCormick, Roger
    LAW AND FINANCIAL MARKETS REVIEW, 2015, 9 (04): : 283 - 292
  • [38] Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate
    Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy
    Rifkin, Will
    Louis, Winnifred
    Moffat, Kieren
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2017, 53 : 347 - 355
  • [39] The discourse of "social licence to operate": case study of the Australian wind industry
    Hall, Nina L.
    AIMS ENERGY, 2014, 2 (04) : 443 - 460
  • [40] Principles to gain a social licence to operate for green initiatives and biodiversity projects
    Vanclay, Frank
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 29 : 48 - 56