The Language of Science and Social Licence to Operate

被引:18
|
作者
Gallois, Cindy [1 ]
Ashworth, Peta [1 ,2 ]
Leach, Joan [3 ,4 ]
Moffat, Kieren [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Psychol & Commun, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sustainable Energy Futures, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Commun, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] CSIRO, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
social licence to operate; science communication; communication accommodation theory; energy; communities; COMMUNICATION; ACCEPTANCE; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/0261927X16663254
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Social licence to operate (SLO) is an informal agreement that infers ongoing acceptance of an industrial or energy project by a local community and the stakeholders affected by it. Negotiation of SLOs centrally implicates language and communication, including scientific language and concepts. We first review the literature about the definition and communicative features of SLOs, and their relation to scientific communication. We describe communication accommodation theory and the ways that it can help understand (un)successful SLO negotiation, and describe examples of texts that show accommodative or nonaccommodative language around SLOs. We summarize some results which help indicate different ways of accommodating communities in the negotiation of SLOs. Finally, we describe a research agenda on communication accommodation and SLOs, in the service of improving their impact on energy, the environment, and the transfer of science.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 60
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conceptualising social licence to operate
    Stuart, Alice
    Bond, Alan
    Franco, Aldina M. A.
    Baker, Julia
    Gerrard, Chris
    Danino, Vittoria
    Jones, Kylie
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
  • [2] Social licence to operate and forestry - an introduction
    Edwards, Peter
    Lacey, Justine
    Wyatt, Stephen
    Williams, Kathryn J. H.
    FORESTRY, 2016, 89 (05): : 473 - 476
  • [3] Engaging for a social licence to operate (SLO)
    Hurst, Bree
    Johnston, Kim A.
    Lane, Anne B.
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2020, 46 (04)
  • [4] The social licence to operate: a critical review
    Moffat, Kieren
    Lacey, Justine
    Zhang, Airong
    Leipold, Sina
    FORESTRY, 2016, 89 (05): : 477 - 488
  • [5] Community engagement and social licence to operate
    Dare, Melanie
    Schirmer, Jacki
    Vanclay, Frank
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2014, 32 (03) : 188 - 197
  • [6] The Social Licence to Operate and the legitimacy of resource extraction
    Meesters, Marieke
    Wostyn, Piet
    van Leeuwen, Judith
    Behagel, Jelle Hendrik
    Turnhout, Esther
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 49 : 7 - 11
  • [7] Conceptualising the role of dialogue in social licence to operate
    Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy
    Rifkin, Will
    Moffat, Kieren
    Louis, Winnifred
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2017, 54 : 137 - 146
  • [8] The emergence of the 'social licence to operate' in the extractive industries?
    Heffron, Raphael J.
    Downes, Lauren
    Rodriguez, Oscar M. Ramirez
    McCauley, Darren
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 74
  • [9] EARNING A SOCIAL LICENCE TO OPERATE IN THE FOOD SECTOR
    Buchtmann, Lydia
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 2014, 66 (01): : 28 - 30
  • [10] Social licence to operate and impact assessment INTRODUCTION
    Bice, Sara
    Moffat, Kieren
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2014, 32 (04) : 257 - 262