Modeling Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in a Coastal Texas Watershed

被引:5
|
作者
Forbis-Stokes, Aaron [1 ,2 ]
Munster, Clyde [3 ]
Karthikeyan, Raghupathy [3 ]
Mohanty, Binayak P. [3 ]
Boulanger, Bryan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Civil Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX USA
[4] Ohio Northern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ada, OH USA
来源
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION | 2016年 / 227卷 / 12期
关键词
Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTSs); Septic system; Aerobic treatment unit (ATU); HYDRUS; Vadose zone; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; SOIL; GROUNDWATER; SURFACE; FLOW;
D O I
10.1007/s11270-016-3120-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTSs) are commonly used to treat domestic wastewater in the Dickinson Bayou watershed, located between Houston and Galveston. The Dickinson Bayou is classified as "impaired" by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality due to high levels of indicator bacterium, Escherichia coli. Failing OWTSs in the watershed are possible sources for the impairment of the bayou. Nearly all of the watershed is at risk to failing OWTSs due to high water table and clay content in the soil. The HYDRUS modeling software for water and solute flow through variably saturated media was used to simulate the performance of (1) conventional OWTSs, (2) aerobic treatment units (ATUs) with spray distribution, and (3) mounded OWTSs under conditions indicative of the Dickinson Bayou watershed. The purpose of the study was to simulate system performance under existing conditions. Simulation results indicated that both the conventional and ATU systems fail due to effluent ponding and E. coli transport to the land surface due to high water tables and clay soils in the watershed. Simulations indicated that conventional and ATU systems failed when rainfall intensity was greater than 0.25 cm/h. However, themodel simulations indicatemound systems did not fail under existing conditions as they did not allow E. coli to reach the surface or ponding to occur. Consequently, mound systems can be considered as better systems in this watershed to minimize bacterial loadings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Field performance assessment of onsite individual wastewater treatment systems
    Moelants, N.
    Janssen, G.
    Smets, I.
    Van Impe, J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 58 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [22] Evaluation of innovative onsite wastewater treatment systems in the green hill pond watershed, Rhode Island - A NODP II project update
    Loomis, GW
    Dow, DB
    Stolt, MH
    Green, LT
    Gold, AJ
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 506 - 515
  • [23] Comparison of Nitrogen Treatment by Four Onsite Wastewater Systems in Nutrient-Sensitive Watersheds of the North Carolina Coastal Plain
    Humphrey Jr, Charles P.
    O'Driscoll, Michael
    Iverson, Guy
    NITROGEN, 2021, 2 (02): : 268 - 286
  • [24] Management of decentralized and onsite wastewater systems
    Bounds, TR
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 435 - 450
  • [25] Onsite and Decentralized Wastewater Management Systems
    Ergas, Sarina J.
    Amador, Jose
    Boyer, Treavor
    Friedler, Eran
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE WATER IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [26] Model Test of Proposed Loading Rates for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Radcliffe, D. E.
    Bradshaw, J. K.
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2014, 78 (01) : 97 - 107
  • [27] Nitrogen Loading from Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in the Greater Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA) Watershed: Magnitude and Reduction Strategies
    Amador, Jose A.
    Gorres, Josef H.
    Loomis, George W.
    Lancellotti, Brittany V.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2018, 229 (03):
  • [28] Nitrogen Loading from Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in the Greater Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA) Watershed: Magnitude and Reduction Strategies
    Jose A. Amador
    Josef H. Görres
    George W. Loomis
    Brittany V. Lancellotti
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229
  • [29] Investigation of an onsite wastewater treatment system in sandy soil: Modeling the fate of surfactants
    McAvoy, DC
    DeCarvalho, AJ
    Nielsen, AM
    Cano, ML
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2002, 21 (12) : 2623 - 2630
  • [30] National onsite wastewater treatment: A National Small Flows Clearinghouse summary of onsite systems in the United States, 1993
    Angoli, T
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 1 - 11