Research Guidelines Endorsed by Annals of Plastic Surgery to Improve the Quality of Published Articles

被引:0
|
作者
Freshwater, M. Felix [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Miami, FL 33156 USA
关键词
TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000000534
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We surgeons use checklists in the operating room to lessen the possibility of errors. Our checklists are based upon international safety guidelines. To improve the transparency and quality of published research, international guidelines, and checklists have been developed by groups that included journal editors, funders, epidemiologists, methodologists, statisticians, and researchers. Adoption of these guidelines has improved the quality and transparency of papers published in different journals. We believe that using these checklists and guidelines will improve the quality and transparency of articles submitted to Annals of Plastic Surgery. We urge all authors to familiarize themselves with the material before they commence their research, as a thorough understanding of the material will enable authors to design and perform better research that is more likely to be accepted for publication. When authors submit their manuscripts, they should include a completed copy of the relevant checklist that indicates which pages of the manuscripts contain the various checklist items.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 126
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methodological Guidelines Designed to Improve the Quality of Research on Cross-Country Skiing
    Barbara Pellegrini
    Øyvind Sandbakk
    Thomas Stöggl
    Matej Supej
    Niels Ørtenblad
    Axel Schürer
    Thomas Steiner
    Angelica Lunina
    Chris Manhard
    Hui Liu
    Olli Ohtonen
    Chiara Zoppirolli
    Hans-Christer Holmberg
    Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise, 2021, 3 : 207 - 223
  • [32] Discussion: Social Media and the Dissemination of Research: Insights from the Most Widely Circulated Articles in Plastic Surgery
    Kubiak, Carrie A.
    Cederna, Paul S.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (02) : 565 - 566
  • [33] Laboratory animal research published in plastic surgery journals in 2014 has extensive waste: A systematic review
    Freshwater, M. Felix
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (11): : 1485 - 1490
  • [34] An assessment of the methodologic quality of medical education research studies published in The American Journal of Surgery
    Reed, Darcy A.
    Beckman, Thomas J.
    Wright, Scott M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (03): : 442 - 444
  • [35] Can we really trust the findings of the COVID-19 research? Quality assessment of the research articles published on COVID-19
    Joshy, Athira S.
    Surendran, Saphal
    Undela, Krishna
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 : 158 - 158
  • [36] oncoplastic breast surgery and involvement of plastic surgery improve quality of life by Breast-Q score in breast conserving surgery
    Stuntz, Michael E.
    Rychkov, Tamara A.
    Garcia, Jenna
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (05)
  • [37] Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research
    Augustine, Haley F. M.
    Hu, Jiayi
    Najarali, Zainab
    McRae, Matthew
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 27 (01) : 54 - 65
  • [38] So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines
    Rohrich, Rod J.
    Weinstein, Aaron
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (01) : 205 - 208
  • [39] What gets published: the characteristics of quality improvement research articles from low- and middle-income countries
    Sifrim, Zoe K.
    Barker, Pierre M.
    Mate, Kedar S.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2012, 21 (05) : 423 - 431
  • [40] Letter is in response to a published manuscript, "Quality of the Information provided by ChatGPT for patients in breast plastic surgery: Are we already in the future?"
    Rahman, Abdul
    Alam, Irfan
    JPRAS OPEN, 2024, 42 : 217 - 218