Impact of mixed ownership reforms on firm innovation-empirical evidence from China

被引:7
|
作者
Wan, Kai [1 ]
Yu, Xiaolin [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Mixed ownership reform; relative control transfer; corporate innovation; agency costs; financing constraints; STATE OWNERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; PRIVATIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; CONSTRAINTS; EFFICIENCY; RIGHTS; SOFT;
D O I
10.1080/15140326.2022.2153545
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Based on data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008-2018, an investigation is carried out upon the impact of mixed ownership reforms and relative control transfers on corporate innovation before and after the occurrence of mixed ownership reforms, and relative control transfers in state-owned and private enterprises, as well as their mechanisms of action. A double-difference propensity score matching method is adopted. It has been found that mixed ownership reforms are more likely to promote innovation in SOEs, particularly in monopolistic industries. A further sub-sample test reveals that in state-owned enterprises in monopolistic industries, the acquisition of relative control by private shares can amplify the innovation effect of mixed ownership reforms. In private companies in competitive industries, state-owned shares can only fuel innovation if they gain relative control. Reducing agency costs and easing financing constraints are important channels for mixed ownership reform to promote corporate innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1354
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental performance and corporate innovation in China: The moderating impact of firm ownership
    Ullah, Farid
    Jiang, Ping
    Elamer, Ahmed A.
    Owusu, Andrews
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 184
  • [22] The Impact of Executive External Pay Disparity on Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from Mixed-Ownership Enterprises in China
    Zhu, Lei
    Qi, Zhe
    Wang, Chunyan
    Liu, Li
    Li, Tong
    Ma, Haixin
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (13) : 3061 - 3083
  • [23] Innovation and Family Ownership: Empirical Evidence from India
    Lodh, Suman
    Nandy, Monomita
    Chen, Jean
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2014, 22 (01) : 4 - 23
  • [24] Innovation output and state ownership: empirical evidence from China's listed firms
    Kroll, Henning
    Kou, Kou
    INDUSTRY AND INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (02) : 176 - 198
  • [25] Exports, Ownership and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China
    Sun, Xiaonan
    Hong, Junjie
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2011, 34 (07): : 1199 - 1215
  • [26] The performance impact of firm ownership transformation in China: mixed ownership vs. fully privatised ownership
    Liu, Guy
    Beirne, John
    Sun, Pei
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2015, 13 (03) : 197 - 216
  • [27] The Impact of Ownership Structure on Technological Innovation and Energy Intensity: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Xiekui
    Yu, Baocheng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [28] Heterogeneous Blockholders and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence From the Mixed-Ownership Reform in China
    Xia, Hui
    Ling, Shixian
    Liu, Zhangxin
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [29] The impact of firm ownership structure on voluntary disclosure: Empirical evidence from Czech annual reports
    Makhija, AK
    Patton, JM
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2004, 77 (03): : 457 - 491
  • [30] Digital inclusive finance and enterprise innovation-Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies
    Xiong, Mingzhao
    Li, Wenqi
    Xian, Brain Teo Sheng
    Yang, Ao
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2023, 8 (01):