Who is in and who is out? Integration of technological knowledge in the multinational corporation

被引:9
|
作者
Blomkvist, Katarina [1 ]
Kappen, Philip [2 ]
Zander, Ivo [3 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Box 513, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Box 513, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Business Studies, Box 513, S-75120 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; EVOLUTION; FLOWS; FIRM; CAPABILITIES; SPILLOVERS; INNOVATION; INTERNATIONALIZATION;
D O I
10.1093/icc/dty024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article concerns the integration of technological knowledge within multinational corporations (MNCs). We empirically investigate the degree of technological knowledge integration of competence-creating subsidiaries with headquarters and sister subsidiaries and explore the effects of intersubsidiary differentiation. Data on the complete US patenting activity of 22 Swedish multinationals from 1893 to 2008 reveal significant differences in degrees of technological knowledge integration. As expected, the results show that greenfield subsidiaries are more integrated with headquarters and other greenfield subsidiaries than with acquired subsidiaries. In contrast, acquired subsidiaries do not appear to be as easily integrated into the MNC, and for this group the empirical evidence shows very little integration of technological knowledge. The findings provide extended insights into the role of competence-creating subsidiaries as providers of technological knowledge to headquarters and other MNC subsidiaries, and suggest a distinct pattern of subsidiary knowledge integration, ordered by what appears to be in-groups and out-groups, that has been overlooked in the prior MNC literature.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 457
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Who's out there?
    Smith, H
    PLATING AND SURFACE FINISHING, 2000, 87 (08): : 8 - 8
  • [42] WHO WILL DRIVE TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCE
    GURNETT, K
    MICROELECTRONICS JOURNAL, 1994, 25 (08) : R3 - R4
  • [43] TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS - WHO BENEFITS
    RESNICK, MI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (01): : 97 - 97
  • [44] INTEGRATION - WHO NEEDS IT
    ARMITAGE, A
    PHYSICS WORLD, 1994, 7 (11) : 80 - 80
  • [46] The PhD track: Who succeeds, who drops out?
    Groenvynck, Hans
    Vandevelde, Karen
    Van Rossem, Ronan
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2013, 22 (04) : 199 - 209
  • [47] Who's out to lunch and who's in the bathroom
    P C Magazine: The Independent Guide to IBM - Standard Personal Computers, 15 (15):
  • [48] Intention-to-treat analysis: Who is in? Who is out?
    Kruse, RL
    Alper, BS
    Reust, C
    Stevermer, JJ
    Shannon, S
    Williams, RH
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 51 (11): : 969 - 971
  • [49] Introduction to Focus: Who's In? Who's Out?
    Amerika, Mark
    Bellavance, Lee
    Bursey, Jeff
    Caesar, Terry
    Domini, John
    Duchamp, L. Timmel
    Feinstein, Sascha
    Flesch, William
    Gatza, Geoffrey
    Goodman, Robin Truth
    Gumbs, Alexis Pauline
    Harp, Jerry
    Haske, Joseph D.
    Held, George
    Hogue, W. Lawrence
    Jaffe, Harold
    Kellman, Steven G.
    Kress, David
    Leitch, Alyson
    Lindgren, Michael
    Marowitz, Charles
    Moraru, Christian
    Olsen, Lance
    O'Rourke, William
    Plate, Liedeke
    Ponce, Pedro
    Raskin, Jonah
    Reda, Sheri
    Sampsell, Kevin
    Schneiderman, Davis
    Smith, J. D.
    Taylor, Keith
    Woessner, Warren
    AMERICAN BOOK REVIEW, 2011, 32 (05) : 3 - 7
  • [50] Knowledge management practices for innovation: a multinational corporation's perspective
    Jimenez-Jimenez, Daniel
    Martinez-Costa, Micaela
    Sanz-Valle, Raquel
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 18 (05) : 905 - 918