Single crystals vs. PZT ceramics for medical ultrasound applications

被引:0
|
作者
Lu, XM [1 ]
Proulx, TL [1 ]
机构
[1] Siemens Med Solut, Ultrasound Div, Mountain View, CA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The major advantages of single crystals (PMN-PT and PZN-PT) over conventional PZT 5H are their high piezoelectric and electro-mechanical coupling constants, which are attractive for high performance transducers. Other properties that contribute to transducer performance, such as velocity, clamped dielectric constant and coercive field, are generally lower for single crystals than for PZT. This paper reviews the strengths and limitations of single crystals for medical ultrasound applications. It is likely impractical to use this material for devices with center frequencies higher than 6 MM, because of the exceptional fragility, the low sound velocity and the low coercive field of single crystal material. For very low frequency arrays with small elements, electrical impedance becomes very high, which causes severe mismatch to the cable and system. An example of a 2.5MHz fine-pitch array with PMN-PT and a triple-layer PZT-5H with simulated and experimental data shows that the single layer PMN-PT array underperforms the multi-layer PZT transducer. Our experience suggests that optimal applications for single crystals in medical ultrasound applications are transducers with 3-5MHz center frequencies and preferably large elements. The results for a 300 mu m pitch, 3MHz PMN-PT array with 90% fractional bandwidth compared to 75% for the same PZT array are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 230
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evolution of ceramics with medical applications
    Salinas, Antonio J.
    Vallet-Regi, Maria
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANORGANISCHE UND ALLGEMEINE CHEMIE, 2007, 633 (11-12): : 1762 - 1773
  • [42] Multi vs. single dose
    Kitchen, R
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2006, 200 (07) : 363 - 363
  • [43] Multi vs. single dose
    R Kitchen
    British Dental Journal, 2006, 200 : 363 - 363
  • [44] Endosonography for mediastinal disease: esophageal ultrasound vs. endobronchial ultrasound
    Meena, Nikhil
    Bartter, Thaddeus
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (04) : E302 - E306
  • [45] Dexketoprofen vs. Tamsulosin vs. Silodosin vs. Tadalafil as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Distal Ureteral Stones in Men
    Gur, Metin
    Ulu, Muhammet Bahaettin
    Caliskan, Suleyman Tumer
    Ozturk, Kemal
    Akdeniz, Ekrem
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2021, 31 (08): : 947 - 952
  • [46] Double- vs. single-balloon vs. spiral enteroscopy
    Lenz, Philipp
    Domagk, Dirk
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 26 (03) : 303 - 313
  • [47] Surgical vs. medical treatment of hypertension
    Weiss, E
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1941, 117 : 2189 - 2189
  • [48] Hyperkalemia: Medical Management vs. Hemodialysis
    Gotesman, Joseph A.
    DeVita, Maria V.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 32 (10): : 305 - 305
  • [49] Medical Ethics: Promise vs. Practice
    Zystra, Bob
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 102 (05) : 453 - 453
  • [50] Medical Facts vs. Value Judgments
    Carlson, Robert W.
    McClure, Joan S.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 373 (15): : 1480 - 1480