Convex Hull Pricing for Demand Response in Electricity Markets

被引:0
|
作者
Ito, Naoki [1 ]
Takeda, Akiko [2 ]
Namerikawa, Toru [3 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Sci Open & Environm Syst, Tokyo 108, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Grad Sch, Dept Math & Informat, Tokyo 1138654, Japan
[3] Keio Univ, Dept Syst Design Engn, Tokyo 108, Japan
关键词
PRICES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Dynamic pricing (a.k.a. real-time pricing) is a method of invoking a response in demand pricing electricity at hourly (or more often) intervals. Several studies have proposed dynamic pricing models that maximize the sum of the welfares of consumers and suppliers under the condition that the supply and demand are equal. They assume that the cost functions of suppliers are convex. In practice, however, they are not convex because of the startup costs of generators. On the other hand, many studies have taken startup costs into consideration for unit commitment problems (UCPs) with a fixed demand. The Lagrange multiplier of the UCP, called convex hull pricing (CHP), minimizes the uplift payment that is disadvantageous to suppliers. However, CHP has not been used in the context of demand response. This paper presents a new dynamic pricing model based on CHP. We apply CHP approach invented for the UCP to a demand response market model, and theoretically show that the CHP is given by the Lagrange multiplier of a social welfare maximization problem whose objective function is represented as the sum of the customer's utility and supplier's profit. In addition, we solve the dual problem by using an iterative algorithm based on the subgradient method. Numerical simulations show that the prices determined by our algorithm give sufficiently small uplift payments in a realistic number of iterations.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEASONAL ELECTRICITY DEMAND AND PRICING ANALYSIS WITH A VARIABLE RESPONSE MODEL
    LILLARD, LA
    ACTON, JP
    BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (01): : 71 - 92
  • [42] Convex Primal Formulations for Convex Hull Pricing With Reserve Commitments
    Yu, Yanan
    Zhang, Tong
    Guan, Yongpei
    Chen, Yonghong
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2021, 36 (03) : 2345 - 2354
  • [43] Modeling and prioritizing dynamic demand response programs in the electricity markets
    Yu, Dongmin
    Xu, Xinyi
    Dong, Mingyu
    Nojavan, Sayyad
    Jermsittiparsert, Kittisak
    Abdollahi, Amir
    Aalami, Habib Allah
    Pashaei-Didani, Hamed
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2020, 53
  • [44] Flexible demand response programs modeling in competitive electricity markets
    Moghaddam, M. Parsa
    Abdollahi, A.
    Rashidinejad, M.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (09) : 3257 - 3269
  • [45] Regulation as an enabler of demand response in electricity markets and power systems
    Annala, Salla
    Lukkarinen, Jani
    Primmer, Eeva
    Honkapuro, Samuli
    Ollikka, Kimmo
    Sunila, Kanerva
    Ahonen, Tero
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 1139 - 1148
  • [46] Stochastic Optimization of Demand Response Aggregators in Wholesale Electricity Markets
    Moghadam, Atefeh Zomorodi
    Saebi, Javad
    Bayaz, Hossein Javidi Dasht
    2015 30TH INTERNATIONAL POWER SYSTEM CONFERENCE (PSC), 2015, : 234 - 240
  • [47] A Strategy for Residential Demand Response Management in Modern Electricity Markets
    Akram, Umer
    Khalid, Muhammad
    Shafiq, Saifullah
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY (ICIT), 2018, : 1138 - 1142
  • [48] Time-based Electricity Pricing for Demand Response Implementation in Monopolized Electricity Market
    Nazar, N. S. M.
    Abdullah, M. P.
    Hassan, M. Y.
    Hussin, F.
    2012 IEEE STUDENT CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SCORED), 2012,
  • [49] Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets
    Hung-po Chao
    Mario DePillis
    Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2013, 43 : 265 - 283
  • [50] Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets
    Chao, Hung-po
    DePillis, Mario
    JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2013, 43 (03) : 265 - 283