Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: Reliable and valid or not?

被引:0
|
作者
Zia, Sadaf [1 ]
Obaid, Munazza Suharwardy
Ahmed, Jamshed
Qazi, Shoreh
机构
[1] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2019年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Clinical reasoning assesment; Key feature question; Cronbach's alpha; BCQ;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if Key Feature questions are reliable for Pakistani medical universities. Methodology: In this cross sectional survey, convenient sampling technique was used and was conducted March 2016 to March 2017 and included 135 medical students. All fourth year students who had completed one month of clinical rotation in the ENT ward were asked to sit for the test after being briefed about the study. The tests were in two parts; the first was of 25 BCQ's which are taken as a regular feature after completion of the clinical rotation. They were given a time of 30 minutes each. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0. Result: Cronbach's alpha for 25 BCQ's was 0.605 where as the Cronbach's alpha for 13 key feature component was 0.560. Conclusion: Ideally, 0.07 and above Cronbach's alpha is considered significant and our results do not. Our results did not come up to the level of significance.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 191
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PSYCHOLOGICAL-ASSESSMENT IS RELIABLE AND VALID - REPLY
    MATARAZZO, JD
    AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 46 (08) : 882 - 884
  • [22] Intelligent Personal Assistant in Business-Context: Key-feature Evaluation for User Acceptance
    Huesson, Daniel
    Holland, Alexander
    Arteaga Sanchez, Rocio
    BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (03): : 147 - 166
  • [23] Attitudes of Veterinary Faculty to the Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Using Extended Matching Questions
    Tomlin, Jane L.
    Pead, Matthew J.
    May, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 35 (04) : 622 - 630
  • [24] How reliable are 'valid and reliable' pain scores in the pediatric clinical setting?
    Voepel-Lewis, Terri
    PAIN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 3 (05) : 343 - 350
  • [25] The comparison of the key feature of clinical reasoning and multiple choice examinations in clinical decision makings ability.
    Zamani, Shohreh
    Amini, Mitra
    Masoumi, Seyede Zahra
    Delavari, Somayeh
    Namaki, Mohammad Javad
    Kojuri, Javad
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (03): : 1115 - 1119
  • [26] Reliable and Valid Assessment of Point-of-care Ultrasonography
    Todsen, Tobias
    Tolsgaard, Martin Gronneboek
    Olsen, Beth Harstedt
    Henriksen, Birthe Merete
    Hillingso, Jens Georg
    Konge, Lars
    Jensen, Morten Lind
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 261 (02) : 309 - 315
  • [27] Reliable and valid assessment of Lichtenstein hernia repair skills
    C. G. Carlsen
    K. Lindorff-Larsen
    P. Funch-Jensen
    L. Lund
    P. Charles
    L. Konge
    Hernia, 2014, 18 : 543 - 548
  • [28] Reliable and valid assessment of Lichtenstein hernia repair skills
    Carlsen, C. G.
    Lindorff-Larsen, K.
    Funch-Jensen, P.
    Lund, L.
    Charles, P.
    Konge, L.
    HERNIA, 2014, 18 (04) : 543 - 548
  • [29] Is there a Valid and Reliable Assessment of Diagnostic Knee Arthroscopy Skill?
    Olson, Tyson
    Koehler, Ryan
    Butler, Aaron
    Amsdell, Simon
    Nicandri, Gregg
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (05) : 1670 - 1676
  • [30] Reliable and valid measures for the clinical assessment of balance and gait in older adults with dementia: a systematic review
    Baker, Jacqueline
    de Laat, Danielle
    Kruger, Emily
    McRae, Sarah
    Trung, Sabrina
    Zottola, Carly
    Omana, Humberto
    Hunter, Susan W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2022, 24 (02) : 85 - 96