Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: Reliable and valid or not?

被引:0
|
作者
Zia, Sadaf [1 ]
Obaid, Munazza Suharwardy
Ahmed, Jamshed
Qazi, Shoreh
机构
[1] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
来源
RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2019年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
Clinical reasoning assesment; Key feature question; Cronbach's alpha; BCQ;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if Key Feature questions are reliable for Pakistani medical universities. Methodology: In this cross sectional survey, convenient sampling technique was used and was conducted March 2016 to March 2017 and included 135 medical students. All fourth year students who had completed one month of clinical rotation in the ENT ward were asked to sit for the test after being briefed about the study. The tests were in two parts; the first was of 25 BCQ's which are taken as a regular feature after completion of the clinical rotation. They were given a time of 30 minutes each. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0. Result: Cronbach's alpha for 25 BCQ's was 0.605 where as the Cronbach's alpha for 13 key feature component was 0.560. Conclusion: Ideally, 0.07 and above Cronbach's alpha is considered significant and our results do not. Our results did not come up to the level of significance.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 191
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review
    Hrynchak, Patricia
    Takahashi, Susan Glover
    Nayer, Marla
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 48 (09) : 870 - 883
  • [2] Twelve tips for developing key-feature questions (KFQ) for effective assessment of clinical reasoning
    Nayer, Marla
    Takahashi, Susan Glover
    Hrynchak, Patricia
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2018, 40 (11) : 1116 - 1122
  • [3] Effects of a supplementary final year curriculum on students' clinical reasoning skills as assessed by key-feature examination
    Nikendei, C.
    Mennin, S.
    Weyrich, P.
    Kraus, B.
    Zipfel, S.
    Schrauth, M.
    Juenger, J.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2009, 31 (09) : E438 - E442
  • [4] Electronic assessment of clinical reasoning in clerkships: A mixed-methods comparison of long-menu key-feature problems with context-rich single best answer questions
    Huwendiek, Soren
    Reichert, Friedrich
    Duncker, Cecilia
    de Leng, Bas A.
    van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
    Muijtjens, Arno M. M.
    Bosse, Hans-Martin
    Haag, Martin
    Hoffmann, Georg F.
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    Dolmans, Diana
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2017, 39 (05) : 476 - 485
  • [5] Special feature: The home assessment profile - A reliable and valid assessment tool
    Chandler, JM
    Duncan, PW
    Weiner, DK
    Studenski, SA
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2001, 16 (03) : 77 - 88
  • [6] Reliable and Valid Assessment of Clinical Bronchoscopy Performance
    Konge, Lars
    Larsen, Klaus Richter
    Clementsen, Paul
    Arendrup, Henrik
    von Buchwald, Christian
    Ringsted, Charlotte
    RESPIRATION, 2012, 83 (01) : 53 - 60
  • [7] DEVELOPING KEY-FEATURE PROBLEMS AND EXAMINATIONS TO ASSESS CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING SKILLS
    PAGE, G
    BORDAGE, G
    ALLEN, T
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1995, 70 (03) : 194 - 201
  • [8] Total mortality: the key-feature of type 2 diabetes
    vor dem Esche, J.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S48 - S48
  • [9] Self-referentiality as a Key-feature of Plato's Theaetetus
    Zucca, Diego
    CULTURA-RIVISTA DI FILOSOFIA LETTERATURA STORIA, 2021, 59 (01): : 7 - 43
  • [10] 'Key findings', 'key features' and 'key clinical decisions' in clinical reasoning assessment
    Lang, Valerie J. J.
    Readlynn, Jennifer
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2023, 45 (12) : 1439 - 1440