Conventional and High-Strength Hooked Bars-Part 1: Anchorage Tests

被引:15
|
作者
Sperry, J. [1 ]
Yasso, S. [2 ]
Searle, N. [3 ]
DeRubeis, M. [4 ]
Darwin, D. [2 ]
O'Reilly, M. [5 ]
Matamoros, A. [6 ]
Feldman, L. R. [7 ,8 ]
Lepage, A. [9 ]
Lequesne, R. D. [5 ]
Ajaam, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Walter P Moore, Orlando, FL 32801 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Kiewit Engn Co, Denver, CO USA
[4] SA Miro Inc, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Kansas, Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[6] Univ Texas San Antonio, Civil & Environm Engn, San Antonio, TX USA
[7] Univ Saskatchewan, Civil & Geol Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[8] Saskatchewan Ctr Masonry Design, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[9] Univ Kansas, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Labs, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
anchorage; beam-column joints; bond and development; high-strength concrete; high-strength steel; hooks; reinforced concrete; reinforcement;
D O I
10.14359/51689456
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper presents the results of an experimental study on the anchorage strength of conventional and high-strength steel hooked bars. Three hundred and thirty-seven exterior beam-column joint specimens were tested with compressive strengths ranging from 4300 to 16,500 psi (30 to 114 MPa). Parameters investigated included the number of hooked bars per specimen, bar diameter, side cover, amount of confining reinforcement, hooked bar spacing, hook bend angle, hook placement, and embedment length. Bar stresses at failure ranged from 22,800 to 144,100 psi (157 and 994 MPa). The majority of the hooked bars failed by a combination of front and side failure, with front failure being the dominant failure mode. Test results show that development lengths of hooked bars calculated based on ACI 318-14 are very conservative for No. 5 (No. 16) bars and become progressively less conservative with increasing bar size and concrete compressive strength.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 265
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fracture toughness of high-strength steel bars
    Elices, M.
    Perez-Guerrero, M.
    Iordachescu, M.
    Valiente, A.
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2017, 170 : 119 - 129
  • [22] A Review on Bond and Anchorage of Confined High-strength Concrete
    Sulaiman, Muhd Fauzy
    Ma, Chau-Khun
    Apandi, Nazirah Mohd
    Chin, Sofrie
    Awang, Abdullah Zawawi
    Mansur, Shaiful Amri
    Omar, Wahid
    STRUCTURES, 2017, 11 : 97 - 109
  • [23] Lap Splice Tests Using High-Strength Headed Bars of 550 MPa (80 ksi) Yield Strength
    Chun, Sung-Chul
    ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2015, 112 (06) : 679 - 688
  • [24] Bond strength of hot-dip galvanized hooked bars in high strength concrete structures
    Hamad, Bilal S.
    Jumaa, Ghaida K.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2008, 22 (10) : 2042 - 2052
  • [25] Research on critical anchorage length of UHPC-CA and HTRB600E high-strength steel bars
    Xu, Gang
    Chen, Binjian
    Zeng, Jun
    Gao, Dejun
    Bao, Hao
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 41 : 235 - 241
  • [26] Quasi-static tests and seismic fragility analysis of RC bridge piers with high-strength steel bars and high-strength/ultra-high performance concrete
    Wu, Dianqi
    Ding, Yang
    Su, Junsheng
    Li, Zhong-Xian
    Liu, Zhengnan
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 297
  • [28] Seismic fragility analysis of high-strength concrete frame structures reinforced with high-strength steel bars
    Liu, Juan
    Zhang, Jianwei
    Zhao, Zuozhou
    STRUCTURAL DESIGN OF TALL AND SPECIAL BUILDINGS, 2024, 33 (10):
  • [29] Blast response of beams built with high-strength concrete and high-strength ASTM A1035 bars
    Li, Yang
    Aoude, Hassan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2019, 130 : 41 - 67
  • [30] TESTS OF HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL COLUMNS
    RASMUSSEN, KJR
    HANCOCK, GJ
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (01) : 27 - 52