Forecasting Uncertainty in Electricity Smart Meter Data by Boosting Additive Quantile Regression

被引:141
|
作者
Ben Taieb, Souhaib [1 ,2 ]
Huser, Raphael [1 ]
Hyndman, Rob J. [2 ]
Genton, Marc G. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia
[2] Monash Business Sch, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Probabilistic load forecasting; smart meters; quantile regression; gradient boosting; SELECTION; PREDICTION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TSG.2016.2527820
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Smart electricity meters are currently deployed in millions of households to collect detailed individual electricity consumption data. Compared with traditional electricity data based on aggregated consumption, smart meter data are much more volatile and less predictable. There is a need within the energy industry for probabilistic forecasts of household electricity consumption to quantify the uncertainty of future electricity demand in order to undertake appropriate planning of generation and distribution. We propose to estimate an additive quantile regression model for a set of quantiles of the future distribution using a boosting procedure. By doing so, we can benefit from flexible and interpretable models, which include an automatic variable selection. We compare our approach with three benchmark methods on both aggregated and disaggregated scales using a smart meter data set collected from 3639 households in Ireland at 30-min intervals over a period of 1.5 years. The empirical results demonstrate that our approach based on quantile regression provides better forecast accuracy for disaggregated demand, while the traditional approach based on a normality assumption (possibly after an appropriate Box-Cox transformation) is a better approximation for aggregated demand. These results are particularly useful since more energy data will become available at the disaggregated level in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:2448 / 2455
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Wholesale electricity price forecasting by Quantile Regression and Kalman Filter method
    Monjazeb, Mohammad Reza
    Amiri, Hossein
    Movahedi, Akram
    ENERGY, 2024, 290
  • [22] Load Forecasting Benchmark for Smart Meter Data
    Viana, Joao
    Bessa, Ricardo J.
    Sousa, Joao
    2019 IEEE MILAN POWERTECH, 2019,
  • [23] Short term electricity demand forecasting using partially linear additive quantile regression with an application to the unit commitment problem
    Lebotsa, Moshoko Emily
    Sigauke, Caston
    Bere, Alphonce
    Fildes, Robert
    Boylan, John E.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 222 : 104 - 118
  • [24] Probabilistic Hourly Load Forecasting Using Additive Quantile Regression Models
    Sigauke, Caston
    Nemukula, Murendeni Maurel
    Maposa, Daniel
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (09)
  • [25] Identifying Risk Factors for Severe Childhood Malnutrition by Boosting Additive Quantile Regression
    Fenske, Nora
    Kneib, Thomas
    Hothorn, Torsten
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2011, 106 (494) : 494 - 510
  • [26] Electricity Consumption Clustering Using Smart Meter Data
    Tureczek, Alexander
    Nielsen, Per Sieverts
    Madsen, Henrik
    ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (04)
  • [27] Electricity Theft Detection Using Smart Meter Data
    Sahoo, Sanujit
    Nikovski, Daniel
    Muso, Toru
    Tsuru, Kaoru
    2015 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (ISGT), 2015,
  • [28] Smart Electricity Meter Data Analytics: A Brief Review
    Pawar, Savita
    Momin, B. F.
    2017 IEEE REGION 10 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGIES FOR SMART CITIES (IEEE TENSYMP 2017), 2017,
  • [29] Probabilistic forecasting of electricity spot prices using Factor Quantile Regression Averaging
    Maciejowska, Katarzyna
    Nowotarski, Jakub
    Weron, Rafal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2016, 32 (03) : 957 - 965
  • [30] Boosting Based Multiple Kernel Learning and Transfer Regression for Electricity Load Forecasting
    Wu, Di
    Wang, Boyu
    Precup, Doina
    Boulet, Benoit
    MACHINE LEARNING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY IN DATABASES, ECML PKDD 2017, PT III, 2017, 10536 : 39 - 51