Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Accurate Prediction of Real-Time Stuck Pipe Incidents

被引:15
|
作者
Khan, Javed Akbar [1 ,2 ]
Irfan, Muhammad [3 ]
Irawan, Sonny [4 ]
Yao, Fong Kam [1 ,2 ]
Rahaman, Md Shokor Abdul [5 ]
Shahari, Ahmad Radzi [1 ,2 ]
Glowacz, Adam [6 ]
Zeb, Nazia [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Petronas, Petr Engn Dept, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol Petronas, Shale Gas Res Grp, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
[3] Najran Univ, Coll Engn, Elect Engn Dept, Najran 61441, Saudi Arabia
[4] Nazarbayev Univ, Sch Min & Geosci, Nur Sultan City 010000, Kazakhstan
[5] Univ Teknol Petronas, Fundamental & Appl Sci Dept, Seri Iskandar 32610, Perak, Malaysia
[6] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Automat Control & Robot, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[7] Univ Management & Technol, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Lahore 55150, Pakistan
关键词
artificial neural networks; drilling operation; machine learning classifiers; RBF Kernel function; stuck pipe; support vector machines; sensitivity analysis; FILL REMOVAL; FOAM;
D O I
10.3390/en13143683
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Stuck pipe incidents are one of the contributors to non-productive time (NPT), where they can result in a higher well cost. This research investigates the feasibility of applying machine learning to predict events of stuck pipes during drilling operations in petroleum fields. The predictive model aims to predict the occurrence of stuck pipes so that relevant drilling operation personnel are warned to enact a mitigation plan to prevent stuck pipes. Two machine learning methodologies were studied in this research, namely, the artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM). A total of 268 data sets were successfully collected through data extraction for the well drilling operation. The data also consist of the parameters with which the stuck pipes occurred during the drilling operations. These drilling parameters include information such as the properties of the drilling fluid, bottom-hole assembly (BHA) specification, state of the bore-hole and operating conditions. The R programming software was used to construct both the ANN and SVM machine learning models. The prediction performance of the machine learning models was evaluated in terms of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Sensitivity analysis was conducted on these two machine learning models. For the ANN, two activation functions-namely, the logistic activation function and hyperbolic tangent activation function-were tested. Additionally, all the possible combinations of network structures, from [19, 1, 1, 1, 1] to [19, 10, 10, 10, 1], were tested for each activation function. For the SVM, three kernel functions-namely, linear, Radial Basis Function (RBF) and polynomial-were tested. Apart from that, SVM hyper-parameters such as the regularization factor (C), sigma (sigma) and degree (D) were used in sensitivity analysis as well. The results from the sensitivity analysis demonstrate that the best ANN model managed to achieve an 88.89% accuracy, 91.89% sensitivity and 86.36% specificity, whereas the best SVM model managed to achieve an 83.95% accuracy, 86.49% sensitivity and 81.82% specificity. Upon comparison, the ANN model is the better machine learning model in this study because its accuracy, sensitivity and specificity are consistently higher than those of the best SVM model. In conclusion, judging from the promising prediction accurateness as demonstrated in the results of this study, it is suggested that stuck pipe prediction using machine learning is indeed practical.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prediction and real-time compensation of qubit decoherence via machine learning
    Sandeep Mavadia
    Virginia Frey
    Jarrah Sastrawan
    Stephen Dona
    Michael J. Biercuk
    Nature Communications, 8
  • [22] Real-Time TCP Packet Loss Prediction Using Machine Learning
    Welzl, Michael
    Islam, Safiqul
    von Stephanides, Maximilian
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 159622 - 159634
  • [23] Prediction and real-time compensation of qubit decoherence via machine learning
    Mavadia, Sandeep
    Frey, Virginia
    Sastrawan, Jarrah
    Dona, Stephen
    Biercuk, Michael J.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 8
  • [24] Real-time pavement temperature prediction through ensemble machine learning
    Kebede, Yared Bitew
    Yang, Ming-Der
    Huang, Chien-Wei
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 135
  • [25] Accurate Bandwidth Prediction for Real-Time Media Streaming with Offline Reinforcement Learning
    Tan, Qingyue
    Lv, Gerui
    Fang, Xing
    Zhang, Jiaxing
    Yang, Zejun
    Jiang, Yuan
    Wu, Qinghua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 15TH ACM MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS CONFERENCE 2024, MMSYS 2024, 2024, : 381 - 387
  • [26] Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction
    Aydin, Zafer
    Kaynar, Oguz
    Gormez, Yasin
    Isik, Yunus Emre
    2018 26TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2018,
  • [27] Real-Time Learning of Accurate Patch Rectification
    Hinterstoisser, Stefan
    Kutter, Oliver
    Navab, Nassir
    Fua, Pascal
    Lepetit, Vincent
    CVPR: 2009 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2937 - +
  • [28] A Comparison of Machine Learning Classifiers
    Srikanth, Phani
    Singh, Amarjot
    Kumar, Devinder
    Nagrare, Aditya
    Angoth, Vivek
    ADVANCED MATERIALS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2011, 271-273 : 149 - 153
  • [29] Real-time tracking with classifiers
    Chateau, Thierry
    Gay-Belille, Vincent
    Chausse, Frederic
    Lapreste, Jean-Thierry
    DYNAMICAL VISION, 2007, 4358 : 218 - +
  • [30] Real-time Prediction of Styrene Production Volume based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Wu, Yikai
    Hou, Fang
    Cheng, Xiaopei
    ADVANCES IN DATA MINING: APPLICATIONS AND THEORETICAL ASPECTS, ICDM 2017, 2017, 10357 : 301 - 312