Going from theory to practice: the mixed success of approval voting

被引:47
|
作者
Brams, SJ [1 ]
Fishburn, PC
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Polit, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] AT&T Labs Res, Shannon Lab, Informat Sci Res Ctr, Florham Pk, NJ 07932 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00355-005-0013-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Approval voting (AV) is a voting system in which voters can vote for, or approve of, as many candidates as they like in multicandidate elections. In 1987 and 1988, four scientific and engineering societies, collectively comprising several hundred thousand members, used AV for the first time. Since then, about half a dozen other societies have adopted AV. Usually its adoption was seriously debated, but other times pragmatic or political considerations proved decisive in its selection. While AV has an ancient pedigree, its recent history is the focus of this paper. Ballot data from some of the societies that adopted AV are used to compare theoretical results with experience, including the nature of voting under AV and the kinds of candidates that are elected. Although the use of AV is generally considered to have been successful in the societies-living up to the rhetoric of its proponents-AV has been a controversial reform. AV is not currently used in any public elections, despite efforts to institute it, so its success should be judged as mixed. The chief reason for its nonadoption in public elections, and by some societies, seems to be a lack of key "insider" support.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 474
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Approval voting, Borda winners, and Condorcet winners: Evidence from seven elections
    Duke Univ, Durham, United States
    Manage Sci, 4 (520-533):
  • [32] Approval voting, borda winners, and condorcet winners: Evidence from seven elections
    Regenwetter, M
    Grofman, B
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (04) : 520 - 533
  • [33] Predicting success in regulatory approval from Phase I results
    Malik, Laeeq
    Mejia, Alex
    Parsons, Helen
    Ehler, Benjamin
    Mahalingam, Devalingam
    Brenner, Andrew
    Sarantopoulos, John
    Weitman, Steven
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 74 (05) : 1099 - 1103
  • [34] Going to extremes: Action research, grounded practice and the theory-practice gap in nursing
    Rolfe, G
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1996, 24 (06) : 1315 - 1320
  • [35] From theory to practice: evaluating success factors of adaptive reuse through a case study
    Vafaie, Fatemeh
    Remoy, Hilde
    Gruis, Vincent
    BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [36] TINKERING TOWARD SUCCESS - PRELUDE TO A THEORY OF SCIENTIFIC PRACTICE
    KNORR, KD
    THEORY AND SOCIETY, 1979, 8 (03) : 347 - 376
  • [37] Success factors of transformative learning: putting theory into practice
    Schnitzler, Tobias
    REFLECTIVE PRACTICE, 2020, 21 (06) : 834 - 843
  • [38] Biosimilar agents in oncology/haematology: from approval to practice
    Niederwieser, Dietger
    Schmitz, Stephan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2011, 86 (04) : 277 - 288
  • [39] Electronic voting systems – from theory to implementation
    Vasilopoulos, Pavlos, 1600, Springer Verlag (441):
  • [40] Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice
    Ivankova, Nataliya V.
    Creswell, John W.
    Stick, Sheldon L.
    FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (01) : 3 - 20