Gastric Cancer Staging: Is It Time for Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

被引:29
|
作者
Renzulli, Matteo [1 ]
Clemente, Alfredo [2 ]
Spinelli, Daniele [1 ]
Ierardi, Anna Maria [3 ]
Marasco, Giovanni [4 ]
Farina, Davide [5 ]
Brocchi, Stefano [1 ]
Ravaioli, Matteo [6 ]
Pettinari, Irene [1 ]
Cescon, Matteo [6 ]
Reginelli, Alfonso [2 ]
Cappabianca, Salvatore [2 ]
Carrafiello, Gianpaolo [3 ]
Golfieri, Rita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, St Orsola Hosp, Dept Expt Diagnost & Special Med, Radiol Unit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Campania L Vanvitelli, Dept Precis Med, Radiol & Radiotherapy Unit, I-80138 Naples, Italy
[3] San Paolo Hosp, Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, ASST Santi Paolo & Carlo, I-20142 Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Dept Med & Surg Specialties Radiol Sci & Publ Hlt, I-25138 Brescia, Italy
[6] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Gen & Transplant Surg Unit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
gastric cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; treatment; diagnosis; SPIRAL CT; LIVER; TUMOR; METASTASIS; RESECTION; MRI; ADENOCARCINOMA; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers12061402
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Gastric cancer (GC) is a common cancer worldwide. Its incidence and mortality vary depending on geographic area, with the highest rates in Asian countries, particularly in China, Japan, and South Korea. Accurate imaging staging has become crucial for the application of various treatment strategies, especially for curative treatments in early stages. Unfortunately, most GCs are still diagnosed at an advanced stage, with the peritoneum (61-80%), distant lymph nodes (44-50%), and liver (26-38%) as the most common metastatic locations. Metastatic disease is limited to the peritoneum in 58% of cases; in nonperitoneal distant metastases, the most involved GC metastasization site is the liver (82%). The eighth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis staging system is the most commonly used system for determining GC prognosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, and 18-fluorideoxyglucose positron emission tomography are historically the most accurate imaging techniques for GC staging. However, studies have recently shown renewed interest in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a useful tool in GC staging, especially for distant metastasis assessment. The technical improvement of diffusion-weighted imaging and the increasing use of hepatobiliary contrast agents have been shown to increase the diagnostic performance of MRI, particularly for detecting peritoneal and liver metastasis. However, no principal oncological guidelines have included the use of MRI as a first-line technique for distant metastasis evaluation during the GC staging process, such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. This review analyzed the role of the principal imaging techniques in GC diagnosis and staging, focusing on the potential role of MRI, especially for assessing peritoneal and liver metastases.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Courtney C. Moreno
    Patrick S. Sullivan
    Bobby T. Kalb
    Russell G. Tipton
    Krisztina Z. Hanley
    Hiroumi D. Kitajima
    W. Thomas Dixon
    John R. Votaw
    John N. Oshinski
    Pardeep K. Mittal
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 2613 - 2629
  • [22] Magnetic resonance imaging for staging and treatment planning in cervical cancer
    Lopez-Carballeira, A.
    Baleato-Gonzalez, S.
    Garcia-Figueiras, R.
    Otero-Estevez, I.
    Villalba-Martina, C.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2016, 58 (04): : 268 - 276
  • [23] The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer
    Kayes, Oliver
    Minhas, Suks
    Allen, Clare
    Hare, Chris
    Freeman, Alex
    Ralph, David
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (05) : 1313 - 1319
  • [24] Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation
    Moreno, Courtney C.
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    Kalb, Bobby T.
    Tipton, Russell G.
    Hanley, Krisztina Z.
    Kitajima, Hiroumi D.
    Dixon, W. Thomas
    Votaw, John R.
    Oshinski, John N.
    Mittal, Pardeep K.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (07): : 2613 - 2629
  • [25] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Urinary Bladder: Cancer Staging and Beyond
    Haider, Ehsan A.
    Jhaveri, Kartik S.
    O'Malley, Martin E.
    Haider, Massom A.
    Jewett, Michael A.
    Rendon, Ricardo A.
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2008, 59 (05): : 241 - 258
  • [26] STAGING OF CERVICAL-CANCER BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    BARTOLI, JM
    MOULIN, G
    DISTEFANOLOUINEAU, D
    GAUBERT, JY
    DELANNOY, L
    DELPERO, JR
    BLANC, B
    KASBARIAN, M
    ANNALES DE RADIOLOGIE, 1990, 33 (4-5) : 241 - 247
  • [27] Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer staging
    Bartram, C
    Brown, G
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2002, 31 (03) : 827 - +
  • [28] Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Axillary Staging in Patients With Breast Cancer
    Mortellaro, Vincent E.
    Marshall, Julia
    Singer, Lauren
    Hochwald, Steven N.
    Chang, Myron
    Copeland, Edward M.
    Grobmyer, Stephen R.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (02) : 309 - 312
  • [29] Magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of gastric carcinoma: Results of an in vitro study
    Palmowski, Moritz
    Grenacher, Lars
    Kuntz, Christian
    Heye, Tobias
    Dux, Markus
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2006, 30 (06) : 896 - 902
  • [30] EVALUATION OF CERVICAL CANCER STAGING BASED ON MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN COMPARISON WITH SURGICAL STAGING
    Akhavan, Setareh
    Mousavi, Azamsadat
    Hassani, Shahrzah Sheikh
    Zamani, Narges
    Torabi, Zohreh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A77 - A77