Response time effectiveness: Comparison of response time and survival in an urban emergency medical services system

被引:139
|
作者
Blackwell, TH
Kaufman, JS
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Ctr Prehosp Med, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[3] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Stat, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[4] Mecklenburg EMS Agcy, Charlotte, NC USA
关键词
prehospital; emergency medical services; response time; effectiveness; standards;
D O I
10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01321.x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Emergency medical services (EMS) administrators seek methods to enhance system performance. One component scrutinized is the response time (RT) interval between call receipt and arrival on scene. While reducing RTs may improve survival, this remains speculative and unreported. Objective: To determine the effect of current RTs on survival in an urban EMS system. Methods: The study was conducted in a metropolitan county (population 620,000). The EMS system is a single-tier, paramedic service and provides all service requests. The 90% fractile RT specifications required for county compliance include 10:59 minutes for emergency life-threatening calls (priority I) and 12:59 minutes for emergency non-life-threatening calls (priority II). All emergency responses resulting in a priority I or priority II transport to a Level 1 trauma center emergency department over a six-month period were evaluated to determine the relation between specified and arbitrarily assigned RTs and survival. Results: Five thousand, four hundred twenty-four transports were reviewed. Of these, 71 patients did not survive (1.31%; 95% CI = 1.04% to 1.67%). No significant difference in median RTs between survivors (6.4 min) and nonsurvivors (6.8 min) was noted (p = 0.10). Further, there was no significant difference between observed and expected deaths (p = 0.14). However, mortality risk was 1.58% for patients whose RT exceeded 5 minutes, and 0.51% for those whose RT was under 5 minutes (p = 0.002). The mortality risk curve was generally flat over RT intervals exceeding 5 minutes. Conclusions: In this observational study, emergency calls where RTs were less than 5 minutes were associated with improved survival when compared with calls where RTs exceeded 5 minutes. While variables other than time may be associated with this improved survival, there is little evidence in those data to suggest that changing this system's response time specifications to times less than current, but g eater than 5 minutes, would have any beneficial effect on survival.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PREDICTING THE RESPONSE-TIME OF AN URBAN AMBULANCE SYSTEM
    SCOTT, DW
    FACTOR, LE
    GORRY, GA
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 1978, 13 (04) : 404 - 417
  • [32] Time Is Money, But How Much? The Monetary Value of Response Time for Thai Ambulance Emergency Services
    Jaldell, Henrik
    Lebnak, Prachaksvich
    Amornpetchsathaporn, Anurak
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (05) : 555 - 560
  • [33] Prehospital Electrocardiogram Transmission is Associated With Decreased First Medical Contact to Device Time in a Large Urban Emergency Medical Services System
    Richards, Christopher
    Pearlman, Ken
    Stein-Spencer, Leslee
    O'Neill, Kathleen
    Schroff, Adhir
    Purim-Shem-Tov, Yanina
    Markul, Eddie
    Weber, Joseph
    Miller, Art
    Magurany, Kathleen
    Weller, Shirley
    Schaer, Gary
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [34] Emergency Medical Service Transport Time and Trauma Outcomes at an Urban Level 1 Trauma Center: Evaluation of Prehospital Emergency Medical Service Response
    Elkbuli, Adel
    Dowd, Brianna
    Sanchez, Carol
    Shaikh, Saamia
    Sutherland, Mason
    McKenney, Mark
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2022, 88 (06) : 1090 - 1096
  • [35] Prehospital Time Interval for Urban and Rural Emergency Medical Services: A Systematic Literature Review
    Alruwaili, Abdullah
    Alanazy, Ahmed Ramdan M.
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (12)
  • [36] TIME RESPONSE OF URBAN WATERSHEDS
    ESPEY, WH
    WINSLOW, DE
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1968, 49 (04): : 677 - &
  • [37] Response time evaluation for emergency medical service as a part of its performance
    Duchateau, Francois-Xavier
    Garnier-Connois, Delphine
    Ricard-Hibon, Agnes
    Josseaume, Julien
    Casalino, Enrique
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2013, 30 (09) : 763 - 765
  • [38] Bystander defibrillation increases 30-day survival even with short emergency medical service response time
    Hindborg, M.
    Yonis, H.
    Gnesin, F.
    Soerensen, K. K.
    Torp-Pedersen, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44
  • [39] Emergency Medical Services Response Time to Cardiac Arrest May be Delayed When Using European Emergency Phone Number in the Czech Republic
    Truhlar, Anatolij
    Jezek, Tomas
    Castren, Maaret
    Plodr, Michal
    Masek, Jiri
    Cerny, Vladimir
    Nikolaou, Nikolaos I.
    CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [40] The 2012 Derecho: Emergency Medical Services and Hospital Response
    Kearns, Randy D.
    Wigal, Mark S.
    Fernandez, Antonio
    Tucker, March A., Jr.
    Zuidgeest, Ginger R.
    Mills, Michael R.
    Cairns, Bruce A.
    Cairns, Charles B.
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (05) : 542 - 545