Filtered back projection revisited in low-kilovolt computed tomography angiography: sharp filter kernel enhances visualization of the artery of Adamkiewicz

被引:10
|
作者
Nishii, Tatsuya [1 ]
Kotoku, Akiyuki [1 ]
Hori, Yoshiro [1 ]
Matsuzaki, Yuji [1 ]
Watanabe, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Morita, Yoshiaki [1 ]
Kono, Atsushi K. [1 ]
Matsuda, Hitoshi [2 ]
Fukuda, Tetsuya [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 5-7-1 Fujishiro Dai, Suita, Osaka 5658565, Japan
[2] Natl Cerebral & Cardiovasc Ctr, Dept Vasc Surg, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Computed tomography angiography; Image enhancement; Aortic diseases; Aortic aneurysm; Aneurysm; dissecting; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; INTRAARTERIAL; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-018-2136-8
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe reliability of assessment of the artery of Adamkiewicz before the aortic repair is highly dependent on the display of the continuity of this artery with the aorta, mainly around the vertebral pedicle, by computed tomography angiography (CTA). We hypothesized that the sharp filter kernel can improve visualization of this continuity of the vessel structure because of its edge enhancement and high-spatial resolution. This study was performed to compare the subjective and objective image quality of spinal CTA reconstructed with sharp and smooth filter kernels.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 40 consecutive patients who had undergone 80-kV CTA to detect the artery of Adamkiewicz before aortic repair. We measured the CT number and the contrast-to-noise ratio of the anterior spinal artery to the spinal cord. Furthermore, the continuity of the artery of Adamkiewicz was evaluated using a 3-point scale (2 points, absolute; 0 points, undetectable).ResultsCTA with the sharp filter kernel showed a significantly higher CT number and contrast-to-noise ratio of the spinal artery than did CTA with the smooth filter kernel (P<.001 for both). Moreover, the sharp filter kernel showed a significantly higher continuity of the artery of Adamkiewicz with the aorta than did the smooth filter kernel (P<.001).ConclusionsThe sharp filter kernel significantly improved the image quality in low-tube-voltage CTA for the assessment of the artery of Adamkiewicz. Thus, CTA with the sharp filter kernel can generate a high-confidence level in the evaluation of the artery of Adamkiewicz.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 311
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [21] Raw-data-based iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection: image quality of low-dose chest computed tomography examinations in 87 patients
    Wang, Haiyan
    Tan, Bingyi
    Zhao, Bin
    Liang, Changhu
    Xu, Zhuodong
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (06) : 1024 - 1032
  • [22] Diagnostic Accuracy in Detecting Fungal Infection with Ultra-Low-Dose Computed Tomography (ULD-CT) Using Filtered Back Projection (FBP) Technique in Immunocompromised Patients
    D'Errico, Luigia
    Ghali, Anita
    Pakkal, Mini
    Mcinnis, Micheal
    Mehrez, Hatem
    Schuh, Andre C.
    Kuruvilla, John G.
    Minden, Mark
    Paul, Narinder S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [23] Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction
    Fabio Becce
    Yosr Ben Salah
    Francis R. Verdun
    Bruno C. Vande Berg
    Frederic E. Lecouvet
    Reto Meuli
    Patrick Omoumi
    Skeletal Radiology, 2013, 42 : 937 - 945
  • [24] Effect of Filtered Back-Projection Filters to Low-Contrast Object Imaging in Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)
    Choi, Sunghoon
    Seo, Chang-Woo
    Cha, Bo Kyung
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (22) : 1 - 14
  • [25] Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction
    Becce, Fabio
    Ben Salah, Yosr
    Verdun, Francis R.
    Vande Berg, Bruno C.
    Lecouvet, Frederic E.
    Meuli, Reto
    Omoumi, Patrick
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (07) : 937 - 945
  • [26] X-ray Computed Tomography Applied to Objects of Cultural Heritage: Porting and Testing the Filtered Back-Projection Reconstruction Algorithm on Low Power Systems-On-Chip
    Corni, Elena
    Morigi, Maria Pia
    Brancaccio, Rosa
    Bettuzzi, Matteo
    Levi, Giuseppe
    Peccenini, Eva
    Morganti, Lucia
    Cesini, Daniele
    Ferraro, Andrea
    2016 24TH EUROMICRO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PARALLEL, DISTRIBUTED, AND NETWORK-BASED PROCESSING (PDP), 2016, : 369 - 372
  • [27] Comparison of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, and Filtered Back Projection for Detecting Hepatic Metastases on Submillisievert Low-Dose Computed Tomography
    Son, Jung Hee
    Kim, Seung Ho
    Yoon, Jung-Hee
    Lee, Yedaun
    Lim, Yun-Jung
    Kim, Seon-Jeong
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2017, 41 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [28] Detection of pure ground-glass nodules in the lung by low-dose multi-detector computed tomography, with use of an iterative reconstruction method: a comparison with conventional image reconstruction by the filtered back-projection method
    Akashita, Shiho
    Tachibana, Yasuhiko
    Sakamaki, Kentaro
    Sogawa, Keiji
    Inoue, Tomio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 33 (03) : 113 - 121
  • [29] Detection of pure ground-glass nodules in the lung by low-dose multi-detector computed tomography, with use of an iterative reconstruction method: a comparison with conventional image reconstruction by the filtered back-projection method
    Shiho Akashita
    Yasuhiko Tachibana
    Kentaro Sakamaki
    Keiji Sogawa
    Tomio Inoue
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2015, 33 : 113 - 121
  • [30] Image Comparative Assessment Using Iterative Reconstructions Clinical Comparison of Low-Dose Abdominal/Pelvic Computed Tomography Between Adaptive Statistical, Model-Based Iterative Reconstructions and Traditional Filtered Back Projection in 65 Patients
    Vardhanabhuti, Varut
    Riordan, Richard D.
    Mitchell, Grant R.
    Hyde, Christopher
    Roobottom, Carl A.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2014, 49 (04) : 209 - 216