Ultra-low doses of rituximab for continued treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (REDO study): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

被引:30
|
作者
Verhoeff, Lise M. [1 ]
den Broeder, Nathan [1 ]
Thurlings, Rogier M. [2 ]
van der Laan, Willemijn H. [1 ]
van der Weele, Wilfred [4 ]
Kok, Marc R. [5 ]
Moens, Hein J. Bernelot [6 ]
Woodworth, Thasia G. [7 ]
van den Bemt, Bart J. F. [1 ,3 ]
van den Hoogen, Frank H. J. [1 ,2 ]
den Broeder, Alfons A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin, Dept Rheumatol, POB 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboudumc, Dept Rheumat Dis, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboudumc, Dept Pharm, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Reade, Dept Rheumatol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Maasstad Hosp, Dept Rheumatol & Clin Immunol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Ziekenhuisgrp Twente, Dept Rheumatol, Almelo, Netherlands
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Rheumatol, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
LANCET RHEUMATOLOGY | 2019年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; EFFICACY; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; REMISSION; DEPLETION; VALIDITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/S2665-9913(19)30066-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Rituximab is an effective treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, given as either two doses of 1000 mg (2 weeks apart) every 6 months (the dose recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency) or two doses of 500 mg (2 weeks apart) or one dose of 1000 mg (a standard low dose) every 6 months. Findings of several small uncontrolled studies suggest that doses lower than the recommended dose or standard low dose might be sufficient for maintenance treatment, potentially improving safety and reducing costs. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of ultra-low doses of rituximab (one dose of 500 mg or 200 mg) with a standard low dose of rituximab (one dose of 1000 mg) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who respond to standard doses of rituximab. Methods The REDO study is a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial done at five centres in the Netherlands. Adults (aged >= 18 years) with rheumatoid arthritis responding well to rituximab were randomly allocated (1:2:2) to receive intravenous rituximab as one dose of either 1000 mg, 500 mg, or 200 mg, respectively. Volumes of all doses were equal to achieve masking. Randomisation lists were computer-generated and stratified by rheumatoid factor or anti-citrullinated protein antibody status (positive or negative) and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (yes or no). The primary analysis was a per-protocol hierarchical testing procedure comparing ultra-low doses with a standard low dose (500 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, followed by 500 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months, 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 3 months, and 200 mg vs 1000 mg at 6 months), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.60 on change from baseline in the 28-joint disease activity score based on C-reactive protein levels (DAS28-CRP). The study is registered at www.trialregister.nl , NTR6117. Findings Between Dec 15,2016, and Sept 20,2018,142 patients were randomly allocated to either 1000 mg rituximab (n=29), 500 mg rituximab (n=58), or 200 mg rituximab (n=55). The 500 mg dose was non-inferior to 1000 mg at 3 months (mean change from baseline in DAS28-CRP, -0.07, 95% CI -0.41 to 0.27) but not at 6 months (0.29, -0.08 to 0.65). Because of the hierarchical testing procedure, non-inferiority could not be tested for the 200 mg dose. 13 patients had serious adverse events, three (10%) in the 1000 mg group, six (10%) in the 500 mg group, and four (7%) in the 200 mg group. The most frequently reported serious adverse events were cardiovascular. No deaths occurred during the study. A significantly lower incidence of infections was seen in the ultra-low-dose groups compared with the standard dose group (1.24 infections per patient-year with the 1000 mg dose vs 0.52 per patient-year with the 500 mg dose and 0.55 per patient-year with the 200 mg dose; rate ratio 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0-83; p=0.013 for 500 mg vs 1000 mg; 0-44,0-22-0. 88; p=0.019 for 200 mg vs 1000 mg). Interpretation Our study did not show non-inferiority of ultra-low doses of rittudinab for continued treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nonetheless, in clinical practice, a strategy with an ultra-low dose of rituximab might be considered after evaluation of risks and benefits, although further studies are needed to establish non-inferiority. Further analyses and a 2-year observational extension are ongoing and should provide further insight into efficacy and safety. Copyright (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E145 / E153
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long versus short peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: results of a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Familiari, Pietro
    de Andreis, Federica Borrelli
    Landi, Rosario
    Mangiola, Francesca
    Boskoski, Ivo
    Tringali, Andrea
    Perri, Vincenzo
    Costamagna, Guido
    GUT, 2023, 72 (08) : 1442 - 1450
  • [32] Doxycycline versus prednisolone as an initial treatment strategy for bullous pemphigoid: a pragmatic, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
    Williams, Hywel C.
    Wojnarowska, Fenella
    Kirtschig, Gudula
    Mason, James
    Godec, Thomas R.
    Schmidt, Enno
    Chalmers, Joanne R.
    Childs, Margaret
    Walton, Shernaz
    Harman, Karen
    Chapman, Anna
    Whitham, Diane
    Nunn, Andrew J.
    LANCET, 2017, 389 (10079): : 1630 - 1638
  • [33] Disease activity guided dose reduction and withdrawal of adalimumab or etanercept compared with usual care in rheumatoid arthritis: open label, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial
    van Herwaarden, Noortje
    van der Maas, Aatke
    Minten, Michiel J. M.
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    Kievit, Wietske
    van Vollenhoven, Ronald F.
    Bijlsma, Johannes W. J.
    van den Bemt, Bart J. F.
    den Broeder, Alfons A.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [34] Pragmatic non-inferiority Randomised trial Investigating Needle aspiration versus ChEst drain for Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax (the PRINCE-SSP study): study protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
    Walker, Steven
    Taylor, Ellie
    Mcandrew, Amy
    Carlton, Edward
    Chaudhuri, Ella
    Ghorpade, Pooja
    Goodwin, Charlotte
    Connors, James
    Cook, Heather
    Luengo-Fernandez, Ramon
    Creanor, Siobhan
    Maskell, Nick A.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [35] Comparison between continued inpatient treatment versus day patient treatment after short inpatient care in early onset anorexia nervosa (COTIDEA trial): a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    Ayrolles, A.
    Bargiacchi, A.
    Clarke, J.
    Michel, M.
    Baillin, F.
    Trebossen, V.
    Kalifa, H. Poncet
    Guilmin-Crepon, S.
    Delorme, R.
    Godart, N.
    Stordeur, C.
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] Comparison between continued inpatient treatment versus day patient treatment after short inpatient care in early onset anorexia nervosa (COTIDEA trial): a study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
    A. Ayrolles
    A. Bargiacchi
    J. Clarke
    M. Michel
    F. Baillin
    V. Trebossen
    H. Poncet Kalifa
    S. Guilmin-Crépon
    R. Delorme
    N. Godart
    C. Stordeur
    BMC Psychiatry, 23
  • [37] Aggressive treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised controlled trial
    van Jaarsveld, CHM
    Jacobs, JWG
    van der Veen, MJ
    Blaauw, AAM
    Kruize, AA
    Hofman, DM
    Brus, HLM
    van Albada-Kuipers, GA
    Heurkens, AHM
    ter Borg, EJ
    Haanen, HCM
    van Booma-Frankfort, C
    Schenk, Y
    Bijlsma, JWJ
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2000, 59 (06) : 468 - 477
  • [38] Clomiphene citrate versus high doses of gonadotropins for in vitro fertilisation in women with compromised ovarian reserve: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Ragni, Guido
    Levi-Setti, Paolo E.
    Fadini, Rubens
    Brigante, Claudio
    Scarduelli, Claudia
    Alagna, Federica
    Arfuso, Veronica
    Mignini-Renzini, Mario
    Candiani, Massimo
    Paffoni, Alessio
    Somigliana, Edgardo
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 10
  • [39] COST EFFECTIVENESS OF TELE-HEALTH FOLLOW-UP IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS BASED ON A NON-INFERIORITY RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    De Thurah, A.
    Skovsgaard, C.
    Maribo, T.
    Hjollund, N. H.
    Kruse, M.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2020, 79 : 98 - 99
  • [40] Effects and costs of real-time cardiac telerehabilitation: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
    Maddison, Ralph
    Rawstorn, Jonathan Charles
    Stewart, Ralph A. H.
    Benatar, Jocelyne
    Whittaker, Robyn
    Rolleston, Anna
    Jiang, Yannan
    Gao, Lan
    Moodie, Marj
    Warren, Ian
    Meads, Andrew
    Gant, Nicholas
    HEART, 2019, 105 (02) : 122 - 129