Preoperative mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation to reduce infectious complications of colorectal surgery - the need for updated guidelines

被引:18
|
作者
Battersby, C. L. F. [1 ,2 ]
Battersby, N. J. [3 ]
Slade, D. A. J. [2 ]
Soop, M. [2 ]
Walsh, C. J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Wrexham Maelor Hosp, Wrexham, Wales
[2] Salford Royal Fdn Trust, Salford, Lancs, England
[3] Wessex Sch Surg, Winchester, Hants, England
[4] Wirral Univ Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Wirral, Merseyside, England
关键词
Bowel preparation; Complications; Surgical site infection; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; ENHANCED RECOVERY; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COMBINATION; AMERICAN; COLON;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2018.12.010
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Increasing evidence indicates that combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces the infectious complications of colorectal surgery. Anecdotal evidence suggests the combination is rarely used in the UK and Europe. Aim: To establish colorectal surgeons' current use and awareness of the benefits of such bowel preparation, and to identify decision-making influences surrounding preoperative bowel preparation. Method: An electronic survey was emailed to all members of the Association of Colo-proctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and promoted via Twitter. Findings: A total of 495 respondents completed the survey: 413 (83.2%) UK, 39 (7.9%) other European, 43 (8.7%) non-European. Respondents used oral antibiotics for 12-20% of cases. Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), phosphate enema, and no preparation, respectively, ranged between 9 and 80%. Combined MBP and oral antibiotic bowel preparation ranged between 5.5 and 18.6%. Fifty-three percent (260/495) agreed that combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation reduces surgical site infection; 32% (157/495) agreed that the combination reduces risk of anastomotic leak. Kappa statistics between 0.06 and 0.27 indicate considerable incongruity between surgeons' awareness of the literature, and day-to-day practice. Twenty-four percent (96/495) believed MBP to be incompatible with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS); 41% (204/495) believed that MBP delays return to normal intestinal function. Conclusions: Few UK and European colorectal surgeons use mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation, despite evidence of its efficacy in reducing infectious complications. The influence of ERAS pathways and UK and European guidelines may explain this. In contradiction to the UK and Europe, North American guidelines recommend incorporating combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation into ERAS programmes. This study suggests that future UK and European guidelines incorporate combined mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation into the ERAS pathway. (C) 2018 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 299
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimizing Preoperative Care: Comparing Mechanical Bowel Preparation Alone Versus Combined Oral Antibiotics in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Salaria, Kainaat
    Bhat, Yamin Manzoor
    Banday, Imad
    Haq, Mohd. Fazlul
    Bhat, Gowhar Aziz
    Parray, Fazl Q.
    Banday, Meeran
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,
  • [22] Mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics reduces infectious complications and anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery: a pooled-analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Yue, Yumin
    Chen, Xi
    Wang, Hui
    Cheng, Min
    Zheng, Bobo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [23] Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation Reduces Length of Stay and Readmissions after Colorectal Surgery
    Toneva, Galina D.
    Deierhoi, Rhiannon J.
    Morris, Melanie
    Richman, Joshua
    Cannon, Jamie A.
    Altom, Laura K.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (04) : 756 - 762
  • [24] Mechanical bowel preparation combined with oral antibiotics reduces infectious complications and anastomotic leak in elective colorectal surgery: a pooled-analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Yumin Yue
    Xi Chen
    Hui Wang
    Min Cheng
    Bobo Zheng
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [25] Preoperative bowel preparation before elective colorectal surgery
    Rogers, Susanne
    COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 44 (05) : 361 - 369
  • [26] Meta-analysis of oral antibiotics, in combination with preoperative intravenous antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation the day before surgery, compared with intravenous antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation alone to reduce surgical-site infections in elective colorectal surgery
    McSorley, S. T.
    Steele, C. W.
    McMahon, A. J.
    BJS OPEN, 2018, 2 (04): : 185 - 194
  • [27] Clinical outcomes following mechanical plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation versus oral antibiotics alone in patients undergoing colorectal surgery
    Kaslow, S. R.
    Gani, F.
    Alshaikh, H. N.
    Canner, J. K.
    BJS OPEN, 2018, 2 (04): : 238 - 245
  • [28] Bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: is mechanical bowel preparation necessary?
    Rollins, Katie E.
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 5 (08): : 712 - 713
  • [29] Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: use by and opinions of Spanish surgeons
    Roig, J. V.
    Garcia-Fadrique, A.
    Garcia-Armengol, J.
    Bruna, M.
    Redondo, C.
    Garcia-Coret, M. J.
    Albors, P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (01) : 44 - 48
  • [30] Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Colorectal Surgery: Is It Necessary?
    Hu, Qiang
    Sun, Yuanshui
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (09) : E511 - E511