Socio-ecological network structures from process graphs

被引:8
|
作者
Lao, Angelyn [1 ]
Cabezas, Heriberto [2 ,3 ]
Orosz, Akos [4 ]
Friedler, Ferenc [3 ,5 ]
Tan, Raymond [6 ]
机构
[1] De La Salle Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Manila, Philippines
[2] Univ Miskolc, Res Inst Appl Earth Sci, Miskolc, Hungary
[3] Pazmany Peter Catholic Univ, Inst Proc Syst Engn & Sustainabil, Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Pannonia, Dept Comp Sci & Syst Technol, Veszprem, Hungary
[5] Szecheny Istvan Univ, Debrecen, Hungary
[6] De La Salle Univ, Chem Engn Dept, Manila, Philippines
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 08期
关键词
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; THEORETIC APPROACH; HABITAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0232384
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We propose a process graph (P-graph) approach to develop ecosystem networks from knowledge of the properties of the component species. Originally developed as a process engineering tool for designing industrial plants, the P-graph framework has key advantages over conventional ecological network analysis techniques based on input-output models. A P-graph is a bipartite graph consisting of two types of nodes, which we propose to represent components of an ecosystem. Compartments within ecosystems (e.g., organism species) are represented by one class of nodes, while the roles or functions that they play relative to other compartments are represented by a second class of nodes. This bipartite graph representation enables a powerful, unambiguous representation of relationships among ecosystem compartments, which can come in tangible (e.g., mass flow in predation) or intangible form (e.g., symbiosis). For example, within a P-graph, the distinct roles of bees as pollinators for some plants and as prey for some animals can be explicitly represented, which would not otherwise be possible using conventional ecological network analysis. After a discussion of the mapping of ecosystems into P-graph, we also discuss how this framework can be used to guide understanding of complex networks that exist in nature. Two component algorithms of P-graph, namely maximal structure generation (MSG) and solution structure generation (SSG), are shown to be particularly useful for ecological network analysis. These algorithms enable candidate ecosystem networks to be deduced based on current scientific knowledge on the individual ecosystem components. This method can be used to determine the (a) effects of loss of specific ecosystem compartments due to extinction, (b) potential efficacy of ecosystem reconstruction efforts, and (c) maximum sustainable exploitation of human ecosystem services by humans. We illustrate the use of P-graph for the analysis of ecosystem compartment loss using a small-scale stylized case study, and further propose a new criticality index that can be easily derived from SSG results.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The socio-ecological psychology of residential mobility
    Oishi, Shigehiro
    Tsang, Shelly
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 32 (03) : 519 - 536
  • [42] Ecotourism: An alternative of socio-ecological crisis?
    Syam, M.
    Aprillia, T.
    Maulana, I
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEGRATED COASTAL MANAGEMENT AND MARINE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 241
  • [43] Socio-ecological principles for a sustainable society
    Holmberg, J
    Robert, KH
    Eriksson, KE
    GETTING DOWN TO EARTH: PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, : 17 - 48
  • [44] A Socio-ecological perspective on refugee resilience
    Fadhlia, Tengku Nila
    Doosje, Bertjan
    Sauter, Disa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 59 : 738 - 738
  • [45] Guatemala City: A socio-ecological profile
    Castillo Cabrera, Fernando
    Haase, Dagmar
    CITIES, 2018, 72 : 379 - 390
  • [46] Socio-ecological roots of cultures of honor
    Uskul, Ayse K.
    Cross, Susan E.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 32 : 177 - 180
  • [47] Socio-ecological correlates of neophobia in corvids
    Miller, Rachael
    Lambert, Megan L.
    Frohnwieser, Anna
    Brecht, Katharina F.
    Bugnyar, Thomas
    Crampton, Isabelle
    Garcia-Pelegrin, Elias
    Gould, Kristy
    Greggor, Alison L.
    Izawa, Ei-Ichi
    Kelly, Debbie M.
    Li, Zhongqiu
    Luo, Yunchao
    Luong, Linh B.
    Massen, Jorg J. M.
    Nieder, Andreas
    Reber, Stephan A.
    Schiestl, Martina
    Seguchi, Akiko
    Sepehri, Parisa
    Stevens, Jeffrey R.
    Taylor, Alexander H.
    Wang, Lin
    Wolff, London M.
    Zhang, Yigui
    Clayton, Nicola S.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 74 - +
  • [48] Socio-ecological influences on political ideology
    Conway, Lucian Gideon, III
    Chan, Linus
    Woodard, Shailee R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 32 : 76 - 80
  • [49] Towards a socio-ecological concept of space
    Hofmeister, Sabine
    Scurrell, Babette
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2006, 15 (04): : 275 - 284
  • [50] A SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL MODEL OF TRANSITION READINESS
    Schwartz, Lisa A.
    Tuchman, Lisa K.
    Barakat, Lamia P.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 39 : 120 - 120