Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004

被引:69
|
作者
Lewis, Edward [1 ]
MacSharry, Brian [1 ]
Juffe-Bignoli, Diego [1 ]
Harris, Nyeema [2 ]
Burrows, Georgina [3 ]
Kingston, Naomi [1 ]
Burgess, Neil D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UN Environm World Conservat Monitoring Ctr, 219 Huntingdon Rd, Cambridge CB3 ODL, England
[2] Luc Hoffmann Inst, Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Geog, Downing Pl, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Nat Hist Museum, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Bldg 3,2Nd Floor, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Aichi target 11; coverage; protected area; protected area downgrading downsizing degazettement; World Database on Protected Areas; DEGAZETTEMENT PADDD; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13056
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Nations of the world have committed to a number of goals and targets to address global environmental challenges. Protected areas have for centuries been a key strategy in conservation and play a major role in addressing current challenges. The most important tool used to track progress on protected-area commitments is the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). Periodic assessments of the world's protected-area estate show steady growth over the last 2 decades. However, the current method, which uses the latest version of the WDPA, does not show the true dynamic nature of protected areas over time and does not provide information on sites removed from the WDPA. In reality, this method can only show growth or remain stable. We used GIS tools in an approach to assess protected-area change over time based on 12 temporally distinct versions of the WDPA that quantify area added and removed from the WDPA annually from 2004 to 2016. Both the narrative of continual growth of protected area and the counter-narrative of protected area removal were overly simplistic. The former because growth was almost entirely in the marine realm and the latter because some areas removed were reprotected in later years. On average 2.5 million km(2) was added to the WDPA annually and 1.1 million km(2) was removed. Reasons for the inclusion and removal of protected areas in the WDPA database were in part due to data-quality issues but also to on-the-ground changes. To meet the 17% protected-area component of Aichi Biodiversity Target 11 by 2020, which stood at 14.7% in 2016, either the rate of protected-area removal must decrease or the rate of protected-area designation and addition to the WDPA must increase.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 579
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protected-area planning in the Brazilian Amazon should prioritize additionality and permanence, not leakage mitigation
    Fuller, Carley
    Ondei, Stefania
    Brook, Barry W.
    Buettel, Jessie C.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2020, 248
  • [32] Correspondence between the habitat of the threatened pudu (Cervidae) and the national protected-area system of Chile
    Pavez-Fox, Melissa
    Estay, Sergio A.
    BMC ECOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [33] Understanding the Cognitive Basis for Human-Wildlife Relationships as a Key to Successful Protected-Area Management
    Teel, Tara L.
    Manfredo, Michael J.
    Jensen, Frank S.
    Buijs, Arjen E.
    Fischer, Anke
    Riepe, Carsten
    Arlinghaus, Robert
    Jacobs, Maarten H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) : 104 - 123
  • [34] Gender Awareness in European Alpine Protected-Area Management Achievements, Shortcomings, and the Way Forward
    Schmitt, Mathilde
    MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 34 (03) : 291 - 296
  • [35] Global protected area impacts
    Joppa, Lucas N.
    Pfaff, Alexander
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 278 (1712) : 1633 - 1638
  • [36] Evolving protected-area impacts in Panama: impact shifts show that plans require anticipation
    Haruna, Akiko
    Pfaff, Alexander
    van den Ende, Sander
    Joppa, Lucas
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [37] EDUCATION AND RECREATION AT HWLAGA - BURMA 1ST STEP IN PROTECTED-AREA EDUCATION
    BERKMULLER, K
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 1984, 11 (04) : 354 - 357
  • [38] Mobilized Bias and Multistakeholder Protected-Area Planning: A Socio-Institutional Perspective on Collaboration
    Barry, Janice M.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2011, 24 (10) : 1116 - 1126
  • [39] Protected-area targets could be undermined by climate change-driven shifts in ecoregions and biomes
    Solomon Z. Dobrowski
    Caitlin E. Littlefield
    Drew S. Lyons
    Clark Hollenberg
    Carlos Carroll
    Sean A. Parks
    John T. Abatzoglou
    Katherine Hegewisch
    Josh Gage
    Communications Earth & Environment, 2
  • [40] Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions
    Venter, Oscar
    Magrach, Ainhoa
    Outram, Nick
    Klein, Carissa Joy
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Watson, James E. M.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 127 - 134