Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Our Clinical Experience and a Systematic Review

被引:15
|
作者
Moreno Sierra, Jesus [1 ]
Ciappara Paniagua, M. [1 ]
Galante Romo, M. I. [1 ]
Senovilla Perez, J. L. [1 ]
Redondo Gonzalez, E. [1 ]
Galindo Herrero, M. I. [1 ]
Novo Gomez, N. [1 ]
Blazquez Izquierdo, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Inst Invest Sanitaria, Serv Urol, ES-28760 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Kidney transplantation; Prostatectomy; Prostatic adenocarcinoma; Prostatic carcinoma; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1159/000446323
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Radical prostatectomy is a more skillful procedure in kidney graft recipients. Robotic surgery can provide a useful minimally invasive tool. Objectives: The study aims to evaluate the robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) in kidney transplant recipients, describing intra/postoperative complications, renal and oncological outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in a single institution of 84 RALP. Four of them were kidney transplant recipients. Side of the renal graft, clinical stage, intra/postoperative events, operating time, creatinine levels before/after intervention and oncologic follow-up were recorded. A systematic review of the literature was performed. Results: Aged 61.25 +/- 7.76 years, interval between renal transplantation and RALP: 10 +/- 3.16 years. Mean prostate specific antigen: 7.1 +/- 2.8 ng/ml, 2 patients were cT1c and 2 cT2a. Preoperative biopsies: Gleason score 3 + 3 in 3 patients, 3 + 4 in 1 patient. Charlson comorbidity index mean was 4.82 +/- 0.82. No intra/postoperative events were reported. Mean operating time: 196 +/- 20.8 min. Positive surgical margins: 2/4 patients. Pathological analysis: Gleason 3 + 4 in 2 patients and Gleason 3 + 3 in the others 2. A patient developed a bladder neck sclerosis. No differences between pre/postoperative creatinine. Three patients are free of biochemical recurrence and 1 patient required adjuvant radiotherapy. Conclusion: RALP in renal transplant recipients is a safe and feasible technique for localized prostate cancer. No difference in oncological outcomes and no impairments on renal function were found. (C) 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 444
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Utility of a Pharmacogenomic Testing Tool among Kidney Transplant Recipients.
    LeCorchick, S.
    Lindberg, L.
    Stapley, W.
    Anand, S.
    Morris, D.
    Srinivas, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 1110 - 1111
  • [42] The Clinical Impact of BK Virus Surveillance On Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients.
    Park, S.
    Lee, J.
    Kwon, E.
    Kim, H.
    Seo, J.
    Jung, H.
    Choi, J.
    Cho, J.
    Kim, Y.
    Kim, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 560 - 560
  • [43] Access to robotic assisted kidney transplant for recipients: a systematic review and call for reporting standards
    Malinzak, Lauren
    Gartrelle, Kendyll
    Sragi, Zara
    Segal, Antu
    Prashar, Rohini
    Jesse, Michelle T.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [44] Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Oncological Results: A Reverse Systematic Review
    Moretti, Tomas Bernardo Costa
    Magna, Luis Alberto
    Reis, Leonardo Oliveira
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (05) : 521 - 530
  • [45] Systematic review on urinary continence rates after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Geraghty, Keith
    Keane, Kevin
    Davis, Niall
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (03) : 1603 - 1612
  • [46] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in a patient with a pelvic kidney
    Boczko, Judd
    Joseph, Jean V.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (05) : 1122.e3 - 1122.e4
  • [47] Applicability of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Allograft Recipients
    Wagener, N.
    Nyarangi-Dix, J. N.
    Teber, D.
    Zeier, M.
    Hohenfellner, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (05) : 1287 - 1292
  • [48] A review of technical progression in the robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Cho, Eric Y.
    Yang, Kevin K.
    Lee, Ziho
    Eun, Daniel D.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (05) : 2171 - 2177
  • [49] Perineal approach to radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients with localized prostate cancer
    Yiou, R
    Salomon, L
    Colombel, M
    Patard, JJ
    Chopin, D
    Abbou, CC
    UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (04) : 822 - 824
  • [50] Oncological and Postoperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter and Comparative Study
    Leonard, Gregoire
    Pradere, Benjamin
    Monleon, Laure
    Boutin, Jean-Michel
    Branchereau, Julien
    Karam, Georges
    Rigaud, Jerome
    Bruyere, Franck
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (03) : 850 - 856