Response to Intervention (RTI) models have attracted great attention as an alternative to traditional methods used for identifying students with learning disabilities. A major feature of this approach is the implementation of academic interventions in general education and measuring the student's response to those interventions. A common question that needs to be addressed is the number of stages or tiers of intervention necessary in the Response to Intervention model. This article reviews three studies of RTI that investigate the RTI tiers. Sharon Vaughn and Rollanda O'Connor report on studies using the Standard Protocol approach to RTI. David Tilly reports on using the Problem Solving Model as an RTI model. This article summarizes the results of these three investigations.
机构:
Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Univ Sydney, Ctr Disabil Res & Policy, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Einfeld, Stewart L.
Tonge, Bruce J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Monash Univ, Sch Psychol & Psychiat, Ctr Dev Psychiat & Psychol, Melbourne, Vic 3004, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Tonge, Bruce J.
Clarke, Kristina S.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sydney, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaUniv Sydney, Brain & Mind Res Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia