What You Do Predicts How You Do Prospectively Modeling Student Quiz Performance Using Activity Features in an Online Learning

被引:7
|
作者
Jensen, Emily [1 ]
Umada, Tetsumichi [1 ]
Hunkins, Nicholas C. [1 ]
Hutt, Stephen [2 ]
Huggins-Manley, A. Corinne [3 ]
D'Mello, Sidney K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
LAK21 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE | 2021年
关键词
Formative assessment; Item Response Theory; Machine Learning; Online Learning; Predicting Student Performance; Retrieval Practice; TESTS; ENGAGEMENT; RETRIEVAL; FRAMEWORK; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1145/3448139.3448151
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Students using online learning environments need to effectively self-regulate their learning. However, with an absence of teacher-provided structure, students often resort to less effective, passive learning strategies versus constructive ones. We consider the potential benefits of interventions that promote retrieval practice retrieving learned content from memory - which is an effective strategy for learning and retention. The goal is to nudge students towards completing short, formative quizzes when they are likely to succeed on those assessments. Towards this goal, we developed a machine-learning model using data from 32,685 students who used an online mathematics platform over an entire school year to prospectively predict scores on three-item assessments (N = 210,020) from interaction patterns up to 9 minutes before the assessment as well as Item Response Theory (IRT) estimates of student ability and quiz difficulty. These models achieved a student-independent correlation of 0.55 between predicted and actual scores on the assessments and outperformed IRT-only predictions (r = 0.34). Model performance was largely independent of the length of the analyzed window preceding a quiz. We discuss potential for future applications of the models to trigger dynamic interventions that aim to encourage students to engage with formative assessments rather than more passive learning strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using the Web in your courses: What can you do? What should you do?
    Poindexter, SE
    Heck, BS
    IEEE CONTROL SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 1999, 19 (01): : 83 - 92
  • [32] How would I say? What do you want? How are you?
    Tutin, Agnes
    LINGUISTICAE INVESTIGATIONES, 2022, 45 (02): : 172 - 196
  • [33] Online immunoaffinity LC/MS/MS. A general method to increase sensitivity and specificity: How do you do it and what do you need?
    Dufield, Dawn R.
    Radabaugh, Melissa R.
    METHODS, 2012, 56 (02) : 236 - 245
  • [34] Do you pay for Privacy in Online learning?
    Ramponi, Giorgia
    Sanyal, Amartya
    CONFERENCE ON LEARNING THEORY, VOL 178, 2022, 178
  • [35] Professionalism - What is it and how do you achieve it?
    Elkins, AD
    FELINE PRACTICE, 1998, 26 (06): : 14 - 14
  • [36] QUALITY - WHAT IS IT AND HOW DO YOU GET IT
    DAVIS, K
    LEDBETTER, WB
    CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1988, 58 (07): : 6 - 6
  • [37] Applicability: What Is It? How Do You Find It?
    Wilson, Virginia
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2010, 5 (02): : 111 - 113
  • [38] Applicability: What Is It? How Do You Find It?
    Wilson, Virginia
    EVIDENCE BASED LIBRARY AND INFORMATION PRACTICE, 2016, 11 (01): : 25 - 27
  • [39] Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it
    Brockner, J
    Chen, YR
    Mannix, EA
    Leung, K
    Skarlicki, DP
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2000, 45 (01) : 138 - 159
  • [40] It's Not What You Do, It's How You Do It: Grounding Uncertainty for a Simple Robot
    Hough, Julian
    Schlangen, David
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI'17), 2017, : 274 - 282