PROACTIVE (IN-OFFICE) VS. REACTIVE (LETTERS) RECRUITMENT FOR AN INTERVENTION TRIAL

被引：0
|
作者：
Pinto, Bernardine M. [1 ,2 ]
Czech, Stephanie [1 ]
Floyd, Andrea [2 ]
Breault, Lisa [1 ]
Lee, Joyce [1 ]
Garcia, Cary [1 ]
Greenwood, Kelly [1 ]
机构：
[1] Miriam Hosp, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Brown Med Sch, Providence, RI USA
来源：
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE | 2007年 / 33卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：S149 / S149
页数：1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tyrosine promotes cognitive flexibility: Evidence from proactive vs. reactive control during task switching performance
    Steenbergen, Laura
    Sellaro, Roberta
    Hommel, Bernhard
    Colzato, Lorenza S.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 69 : 50 - 55
  • [32] Behavioural-type coping strategies in leisure dromedary camels: factors determining reactive vs. proactive responses
    Pastrana, Carlos Iglesias
    Gonzalez, Francisco Javier Navas
    Ciani, Elena
    Mclean, Amy Katherine
    Bermejo, Juan Vicente Delgado
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2024, 272
  • [33] Methadone vs. morphine SR for treatment of neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled trial and the challenges in recruitment
    Lynch, Mary
    Moulin, Dwight
    Perez, Jordy
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN-REVUE CANADIENNE DE LA DOULEUR, 2019, 3 (01): : 180 - 189
  • [34] A randomized, controlled trial of duloxetine alone vs. duloxetine plus a telephone intervention in the treatment of depression
    Perahia, David G. S.
    Quail, Deborah
    Gandhi, Paul
    Walker, Daniel J.
    Peveler, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2008, 108 (1-2) : 33 - 41
  • [35] Randomised clinical trial: transoral incisionless fundoplication vs. sham intervention to control chronic GERD
    Hakansson, B.
    Montgomery, M.
    Cadiere, G. B.
    Rajan, A.
    des Varannes, S. Bruley
    Lerhun, M.
    Coron, E.
    Tack, J.
    Bischops, R.
    Thorell, A.
    Arnelo, U.
    Lundell, L.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 42 (11-12) : 1261 - 1270
  • [36] A PRAGMATIC, RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF FIT VS. COLONOSCOPY OUTREACH: PATTERNS OF SCREENING INITIATION BY INTERVENTION DOSE
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    Skinner, Celette S.
    Gupta, Samir
    Halm, Ethan
    Ahn, Chul
    Sanders, Joanne
    McCallister, Katharine
    Singal, Amit G.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 154 (06) : S56 - S57
  • [37] Optimizing MASLD trial recruitment: LiverPRO vs. FIB-4 in reducing false positives and unnecessary biopsies
    Lindvig, Katrine
    Alkhouri, Naim
    Nadeem, Rida
    Patel, Aarya
    Chughtai, Manal
    Hemant, Sahasraara
    Fallouh, Yasmeen
    Kapoor, Himanshi
    Hansen, Camilla Dalby
    Thorhauge, Katrine
    Hansen, Johanne Kragh
    Johansen, Stine
    Schnefeld, Helle
    Andersen, Peter
    Villesen, Ida Falk
    Bech, Katrine Tholstrup
    Torp, Nikolaj
    Detlefsen, Sonke
    Israelsen, Mads
    Thiele, Maja
    Krag, Aleksander
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 80 : S510 - S511
  • [38] A comparison between print vs. internet methods for a clinical trial recruitment-A pan European OCD study
    Carmi, L.
    Zohar, J.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 (06) : 874 - 878
  • [39] Prevalence of Treated Gout in Scotland, England and Denmark and Summary of Recruitment into the Febuxostat vs. Allopurinol Streamlined Trial (FAST)
    Jennings, Claudine
    Mackenzie, Isla S.
    Flynn, Rob
    Ford, Ian
    Nuki, George
    MacDonald, Thomas M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 400 - 401
  • [40] Changes in Estimated Cardiovascular Risk Using Proactive Multifactorial Intervention vs. Continued Usual Care in Latin American Versus Non-Latin American Patients Enrolled in The Crucial Trial
    Pavia, Abel
    Zamorano, Jose
    Erdine, Serap
    Kim, Jae-Hyung
    Al-Khadra, Ayman
    Westergaard, Mogens
    Sutradhar, Santosh
    Yunis, Carla
    HYPERTENSION, 2011, 58 (05) : E120 - E120
12345