Detection of antibodies against serotypes 1 and 2 infectious Bursal disease virus by commercial ELISA kits

被引:8
|
作者
Ashraf, S [1 ]
Abdel-Alim, G [1 ]
Saif, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Ohio Agr Res & Dev Ctr, Food Anim Hlth Res Program, Wooster, OH 44691 USA
关键词
infections bursal disease virus; chicken; commercial ELISA;
D O I
10.1637/7436-090805R.1
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Two distinct serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) are recognized in chicken and turkey flocks in the United States. Serologic testing of chicken flocks for serotype I viruses is routinely performed to monitor disease status and vaccination. Earlier studies indicated that enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test detects antibodies to both serotypes of the virus, while the Virus neutralization (VN) test is serotype specific. It is useful to evaluate currently available commercial ELISA kits for their ability to differentiate between antibodies elicited by the two serotypes. Three trials were performed in which chickens were orally inoculated with either a high or a low dose of serotype 1 STC or serotype 2 OH strains of IBDV. Sera collected at 0, 7, 14, and 21 days from these chickens and antisera procured from naturally infected broiler (n = 20) and layer (n = 30) flocks were tested with five different commercial ELISA kits and by VN. All ELISA kits detected different levels of antibodies elicited against serotype I of the virus and moderate and high levels of antibodies against serotype 2 virus. A correlation existed between the ELISA and the VN titers of experimentally infected chickens. All serum samples tested from the commercial layer flocks and 65% of the broiler flocks had antibodies against the OH strain. However, no correlation between the VN titers and ELISA titers was observed for the commercial broilers and layers sera by the majority of the kits. The results indicated that Currently available commercial ELISA kits detect antibodies elicited by the two serotypes of IBDV. Hence, the prevalence of serotype 2 antibodies in the flocks should be considered while determining antibody profiles of the flocks against serotype I viruses.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 109
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RAPID DETECTION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE ANTIBODIES BY COUNTERIMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS
    BERG, NW
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1982, 11 (04) : 611 - 614
  • [33] A liquid phase blocking ELISA for the detection of antibodies against infectious bronchitis virus
    Cardoso, TC
    Mouro-Sousa, RL
    Oliveira, C
    Stringhini, G
    Augusto-Pinto, A
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 32 (06) : 747 - 752
  • [34] The efficacy of ELISA commercial kits for the screening of equine infectious anemia virus infection
    Alvarez, Irene
    Cipolini, Fabiana
    Wigdorovitz, Andres
    Trono, Karina
    Barrandeguy, Maria E.
    REVISTA ARGENTINA DE MICROBIOLOGIA, 2015, 47 (01): : 25 - 28
  • [35] Protective immunity against infectious bursal disease virus in chickens in the absence of virus-specific antibodies
    Yeh, HY
    Rautenschlein, S
    Sharma, JM
    VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY, 2002, 89 (3-4) : 149 - 158
  • [37] Production of IgG2 class of monoclonal antibodies against a vaccine strain of infectious bursal disease virus
    Cheema, JK
    Batth, BK
    Oberoi, MS
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2001, 71 (02): : 83 - 87
  • [38] QUANTITATIVE COUNTERIMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS FOR ESTIMATION OF ANTIBODIES TO INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS
    RAJ, GD
    THANGAVELU, A
    ELANKUMARAN, S
    KOTEESWARAN, A
    VENUGOPALAN, AT
    VETERINARY RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 1994, 18 (04) : 289 - 293
  • [39] Effect of different levels of maternally derived antibodies on protection against infectious bursal disease virus
    Al-Natour, MQ
    Ward, LA
    Saif, YM
    Stewart-Brown, B
    Keck, LD
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2004, 48 (01) : 177 - 182
  • [40] PRODUCTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES AGAINST VARIANT-A INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS
    CRUZCOY, JS
    GIAMBRONE, JJ
    PANANGALA, VS
    AVIAN DISEASES, 1993, 37 (02) : 406 - 411