Determination of pore diameter and molecular weight cut-off of hydrogel-membrane liquid-core capsules for immunoisolation

被引:27
|
作者
Dembczynski, R [1 ]
Jankowski, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Agr Poznan, Dept Biotechnol & Food Microbiol, PL-61623 Poznan, Poland
关键词
alginate/starch capsules; inverse size exclusion chromatography; pore size; molecular weight cut-off; immunoisolation;
D O I
10.1163/156856201753252552
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The exclusion limit expressed as the largest pore size of capsules composed of hydrogel Ca-alginate membrane and hydroxy-propyl-ammonium starch liquid core considered as the immunoprotective system has been determined by means of inverse size exclusion chromatography with dextran molecular weight standards. The exclusion limits of the capsules were not influenced by the change of starch concentration in the core solution from 4 to 6% but were influenced by the change in alginate concentration in the membrane from 0.5 to 1.0%, causing the membranes to be less permeable. It was found that the diameter of the largest pores in hydrogel membranes was in the range 7.2-8.0 nm. Based on the relationship between solute size and its molecular weight, the capsules had an approximate exclusion limit of 21-25 kD for dextran and 78-103 kD for protein, which is sufficient to block the antibodies penetrating through the membrane.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1058
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Control of molecular weight cut-off for immunoisolation by multilayering glycol chitosan-alginate polyion complex on alginate-based microcapsules
    Sakai, S
    Ono, T
    Ijima, H
    Kawakami, K
    JOURNAL OF MICROENCAPSULATION, 2000, 17 (06) : 691 - 699
  • [22] Searching for ultrafiltration membrane molecular weight cut-off for water treatment in recirculating aquaculture system
    Widiasa, I. Nyoman
    Harvianto, Gregorius R.
    Susanto, Heru
    Istirokhatun, Titik
    Agustini, Tri W.
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2018, 21 : 133 - 142
  • [23] Steric-hindrance pore model for separation of uncharged solutes by nanofiltration with molecular weight cut-off as parameters
    Zhang, Xianqiu
    Zhang, Linsheng
    Lu, Xiwu
    Du, Mingxia
    Huagong Xuebao/Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), 2007, 58 (08): : 2033 - 2037
  • [24] The influence of natural organic matter and cations on fouled nanofiltration membrane effective molecular weight cut-off
    Comerton, Anna M.
    Andrews, Robert C.
    Bagley, David M.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2009, 327 (1-2) : 155 - 163
  • [25] Study on molecular weight cut-off performance of asymmetric aromatic polyimide membrane "Effect of the additive agents"
    Okazaki, I
    Ohya, H
    Semenova, SI
    Aihara, M
    Negishi, Y
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1998, 141 (02) : 277 - 282
  • [26] Use of a high cut-off membrane for the dialytic removal of middle molecular weight substances from blood
    Storr, M.
    Goehl, H.
    Krause, B.
    Morgera, S.
    Hutchison, C.
    Bradwell, A. R.
    BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2006, 24 (5-6) : 472 - 472
  • [27] Molecular weight cut-off determination of organic solvent nanofiltration membranes using poly(propylene glycol)
    Davey, Christopher John
    Low, Ze-Xian
    Wirawan, Remigius H.
    Patterson, Darrell Alec
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2017, 526 : 221 - 228
  • [28] Atomic force microscopy characterization of ultrafiltration membranes: correspondence between surface pore dimensions and molecular weight cut-off
    Bowen, WR
    Doneva, TA
    SURFACE AND INTERFACE ANALYSIS, 2000, 29 (08) : 544 - +
  • [29] Treatment of concentrated arsenic(V) solutions by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with high molecular weight cut-off membrane
    Beolchini, F.
    Pagnanelli, F.
    De Michelis, I.
    Veglio, F.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2007, 148 (1-2) : 116 - 121
  • [30] A refined one-filtration method for aqueous based nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membrane molecular weight cut-off determination using polyethylene glycols
    Rohani, Rosiah
    Hyland, Margaret
    Patterson, Darrell
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 382 (1-2) : 278 - 290