Considerations on the Environmental and Social Sustainability of Animal-Based Policies

被引:8
|
作者
Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano [1 ]
Lamonaca, Emilia [1 ]
Tappi, Marco [1 ]
Di Gioia, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Sci Agr Food & Environm, Via Napoli 25, I-71121 Foggia, Italy
来源
SUSTAINABILITY | 2019年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
animal welfare; GHG emission; EU policy; livestock; rural development; sustainability; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; AGRICULTURAL POLICY; LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; GHG EMISSIONS; TRADE-OFF; LAND-USE; EFFICIENCY; EXPANSION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/su11082316
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The contribution of the livestock sector to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as the worsening of animal welfare, with the intensification of production methods, have become increasingly relevant. Our contribution investigates the environmental impacts, in terms of methane and nitrous oxide emissions, of animal-based policies supported by the European Union. We examine factors affecting the adoption and the magnitude of related budget of Measure 215animal welfareof Rural Development Programmes 2007-2013. Our focus is cattle farming in Italy. The results highlight that the problem of animal welfare is highly perceived in regions with greater livestock intensity, also where GHG emissions are relevant. Given the adoption of measure 215, more budget tends to be allocated in regions where livestock units are particularly high. In addition, from the analysis emerges the bargaining position of regions with a higher propensity to the agricultural sector.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Animal Research Committee: Advocating for Animal-Based Neuropsychopharmacology Research
    Izenwasser, Sari
    Jentsch, James
    Clifford, Paula
    France, Logan
    Dettmer, Amanda
    Carroll, Marilyn
    Ator, Nancy
    Jentsch, James
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 42 : S109 - S110
  • [32] Differences in perspectives on sustainability attributes of dietary protein sources between reduced animal-based dieters and nondieters
    Tompa, Orsolya
    Kiss, Anna
    Lakner, Zoltan
    Unger-Plasek, Brigitta
    Temesi, Agoston
    HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [33] Suitability of animal-based indicators for the detection of animal welfare in horses
    Czycholl, Irena
    Klingbeil, Philipp
    Krieter, Joachim
    TIERAERZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 2017, 72 (06) : 209 - 217
  • [34] Animal-based studies will be essential for precision medicine
    Lloyd, K. C. Kent
    Robinson, Peter N.
    MacRae, Calum A.
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2016, 8 (352)
  • [35] Can environmental variables replace some animal-based parameters in welfare assessment of dairy cows?
    Muelleder, C.
    Troxler, J.
    Laaha, G.
    Waiblinger, S.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2007, 16 (02) : 153 - 156
  • [36] COVID-19 and Animal-Based Research
    Villano, Jason S.
    COMPARATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 71 (05) : 331 - 332
  • [37] Pandemic prevention and unsustainable animal-based consumption
    Sandhu, Harman S.
    Arora, Anish
    Sarker, Saadia, I
    Shah, Bindra
    Sivendra, Anusha
    Winsor, Emily S.
    Luthra, Anahat
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2021, 99 (08) : 603 - 605
  • [38] Scientific inertia in animal-based research in biomedicine
    Lohse, Simon
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2021, 89 : 41 - 51
  • [39] Animal-Based Medical Diagnostics: A Regulatory Problem
    Avery, Matthew
    Galvan, Makenzi
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2020, 75 (03) : 370 - 414
  • [40] Agency, learning and animal-based reinforcement learning
    Alonso, E
    Mondragón, E
    AGENTS AND COMPUTATIONAL AUTONOMY: POTENTIAL, RISKS, AND SOLUTIONS, 2004, 2969 : 1 - 6