The LMA CTrach™, a new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision:: evaluation in 100 patients

被引:71
|
作者
Liu, EHC
Goy, RWL
Chen, FG
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore 119074, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Singapore 119074, Singapore
关键词
equipment; laryngeal masks; LMA CTrach (TM); intubation; endotracheal;
D O I
10.1093/bja/ael001
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The LMA CTrach (TM) is a new laryngeal mask system consisting of an LMA CTrach (TM) Airway with integrated fibreoptic channels, and a detachable LMA CTrach (TM) Viewer. This system enables viewing of the larynx and aids endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask airway. Method. We used and evaluated this system in 100 adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia for elective surgery. Our primary outcomes were the success rates of LMA CTrach (TM) Airway insertion and endotracheal intubation with this system. Results. We were able to insert the LMA CTrach (TM) Airway in and to ventilate all 100 patients. We were successful in endotracheal intubation, either under vision or blind, in 96 patients. We were able to view the larynx in 84 patients, but the quality of the best view obtained was very variable. The median ( inter quartile range) time for the complete intubation process was 166 ( 114-233)s. The system allowed nearly continuous ventilation and oxygenation during the process. Conclusions. The LMA CTrach (TM) system has potential advantages over the LMA Fastrach (TM) system, including the ability to align the LMA outlet with the larynx and a high first intubation attempt success rate. However, it was difficult to view the larynx with the LMA CTrach (TM) compared with direct laryngoscopy, and expectations must be moderated.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 400
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endotracheal Intubation Versus Laryngeal Mask Airway for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Children
    Acquaviva, Michael A.
    Horn, Nicole D.
    Gupta, Sandeep K.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2014, 59 (01): : 54 - 56
  • [22] Removal of laryngeal mask airway guide after endotracheal intubation
    Kessell, G
    Gray, C
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (02): : 469 - 470
  • [23] A randomised preliminary study to compare the performance of fibreoptic bronchoscope and laryngeal mask airway CTrach (LMA CTrach) for visualisation of laryngeal structures at the end of thyroidectomy
    Chilkoti, Geetanjali T.
    Agarwal, Mayank
    Mohta, Medha
    Saxena, Ashok K.
    Sharma, Chhavi S.
    Ahmed, Zainab
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (08) : 704 - 709
  • [24] Evaluation of the intubating laryngeal mask as a primary airway device and a guide for blind endotracheal intubation
    Ferson, DZ
    Supkis, DE
    Rahlfs, TF
    Jones, RL
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) : A485 - A485
  • [25] Can the laryngeal mask airway replace endotracheal intubation for airway control? Comments
    Gurman, GM
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 6 (04): : 244 - 245
  • [26] Endotracheal intubation and a laryngeal mask airway in a child with Mallampati class zero airway
    Okamoto, E
    Sakuragi, T
    Sugi, Y
    Shono, S
    Higa, K
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (02): : 557 - 557
  • [28] An evaluation of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ in 100 patients
    Tan, B. H.
    Chen, F. G.
    Liu, E. H. C.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2010, 38 (03) : 550 - 554
  • [29] Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (CTrach™) and Direct Coupled Interface-Video Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation: a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study
    Hosten, Tulay
    Gurkan, Yavuz
    Ozdamar, Dilek
    Tekin, Murat
    Solak, Mine
    Toker, Kamil
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 29 (03) : 268 - 272
  • [30] COMPARISON OF POST INTUBATION COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE AND LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY
    Razavi, S. S.
    Salimi, A.
    Mohajerani, S. A.
    Pooyanfar, A.
    Malek, S.
    Mottaghi, K.
    Eftekharian, A.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 : 706 - 706