Diagnosing atmosphere-land feedbacks in CMIP5 climate models

被引:22
|
作者
Williams, C. J. R. [1 ]
Allan, R. P. [1 ]
Kniveton, D. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, NCAS Climate, Dept Meteorol, Reading RG6 6BB, Berks, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2012年 / 7卷 / 04期
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
atmosphere-land surface feedback; CMIP5; tropics; SOIL-MOISTURE; PRECIPITATION; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/7/4/044003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Human-made transformations to the environment, and in particular the land surface, are having a large impact on the distribution (in both time and space) of rainfall, upon which all life is reliant. Focusing on precipitation, soil moisture and near-surface temperature, we compare data from Phase 5 of the Climate Modelling Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), as well as blended observational-satellite data, to see how the interaction between rainfall and the land surface differs (or agrees) between the models and reality, at daily timescales. As expected, the results suggest a strong positive relationship between precipitation and soil moisture when precipitation leads and is concurrent with soil moisture estimates, for the tropics as a whole. Conversely a negative relationship is shown when soil moisture leads rainfall by a day or more. A weak positive relationship between precipitation and temperature is shown when either leads by one day, whereas a weak negative relationship is shown over the same time period between soil moisture and temperature. Temporally, in terms of lag and lead relationships, the models appear to be in agreement on the overall patterns of correlation between rainfall and soil moisture. However, in terms of spatial patterns, a comparison of these relationships across all available models reveals considerable variability in the ability of the models to reproduce the correlations between precipitation and soil moisture. There is also a difference in the timings of the correlations, with some models showing the highest positive correlations when precipitation leads soil moisture by one day. Finally, the results suggest that there are 'hotspots' of high linear gradients between precipitation and soil moisture, corresponding to regions experiencing heavy rainfall. These results point to an inability of the CMIP5 models to simulate a positive feedback between soil moisture and precipitation at daily timescales. Longer timescale comparisons and experiments at higher spatial resolutions, where the impact of the spatial heterogeneity of rainfall on the initiation of convection and supply of moisture is included, would be expected to improve process understanding further.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Bellenger, H.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Leloup, J.
    Lengaigne, M.
    Vialard, J.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 1999 - 2018
  • [22] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [23] Evaluating biases in simulated land surface albedo from CMIP5 global climate models
    Li, Yue
    Wang, Tao
    Zeng, Zhenzhong
    Peng, Shushi
    Lian, Xu
    Piao, Shilong
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2016, 121 (11) : 6178 - 6190
  • [24] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    H. Bellenger
    E. Guilyardi
    J. Leloup
    M. Lengaigne
    J. Vialard
    Climate Dynamics, 2014, 42 : 1999 - 2018
  • [25] Extreme hot summers in China in the CMIP5 climate models
    Guoyong Leng
    Qiuhong Tang
    Shengzhi Huang
    Xuejun Zhang
    Climatic Change, 2016, 135 : 669 - 681
  • [26] Temperature dependent climate projection deficiencies in CMIP5 models
    Christensen, Jens H.
    Boberg, Fredrik
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [27] Timescale dependence of airborne fraction and underlying climate-carbon-cycle feedbacks for weak perturbations in CMIP5 models
    Mendonca, Guilherme L. Torres
    Pongratz, Julia
    Reick, Christian H.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2024, 21 (07) : 1923 - 1960
  • [28] Extreme hot summers in China in the CMIP5 climate models
    Leng, Guoyong
    Tang, Qiuhong
    Huang, Shengzhi
    Zhang, Xuejun
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2016, 135 (3-4) : 669 - 681
  • [29] CMIP5 Climate Models Overestimate Cooling by Volcanic Aerosols
    Chylek, Petr
    Folland, Chris
    Klett, James D.
    Dubey, Manvendra K.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (03)
  • [30] Assessment of sea ice-atmosphere links in CMIP5 models
    Emma J. D. Boland
    Thomas J. Bracegirdle
    Emily F. Shuckburgh
    Climate Dynamics, 2017, 49 : 683 - 702