Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy

被引:41
|
作者
Fedorov, Andriy [1 ]
Tuncali, Kemal [1 ]
Fennessy, Fiona M. [1 ]
Tokuda, Junichi [1 ]
Hata, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Wells, William M. [1 ]
Kikinis, Ron [1 ]
Tempany, Clare M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Surg Planning Lab, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
prostate cancer; image-guided interventions; prostate biopsy; image registration; nonrigid registration; mutual information; performance characterization; DEFORMABLE ORGAN REGISTRATION; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; 3; T; CANCER; FEASIBILITY; TRUS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23688
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop and evaluate image registration methodology for automated re-identification of tumor-suspicious foci from preprocedural MR exams during MR-guided transperineal prostate core biopsy. Materials and Methods: A hierarchical approach for automated registration between planning and intra-procedural T2-weighted prostate MRI was developed and evaluated on the images acquired during 10 consecutive MR-guided biopsies. Registration accuracy was quantified at image-based landmarks and by evaluating spatial overlap for the manually segmented prostate and sub-structures. Registration reliability was evaluated by simulating initial mis-registration and analyzing the convergence behavior. Registration precision was characterized at the planned biopsy targets. Results: The total computation time was compatible with a clinical setting, being at most 2 min. Deformable registration led to a significant improvement in spatial overlap of the prostate and peripheral zone contours compared with both rigid and affine registration. Average in-slice landmark registration error was 1.3 +/- 0.5 mm. Experiments simulating initial mis-registration resulted in an estimated average capture range of 6 mm and an average in-slice registration precision of +/-0.3 mm. Conclusion: Our registration approach requires minimum user interaction and is compatible with the time constraints of our interventional clinical workflow. The initial evaluation shows acceptable accuracy, reliability and consistency of the method. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:987992. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 992
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiogenomics of MRI-Guided Prostate Cancer Biopsy Habitats
    Stoyanova, R.
    Tachar, M.
    Erho, N.
    Lynne, C.
    Abraham, S.
    Patel, M.
    Buerki, C.
    Lam, L.
    Jorda, M.
    Kryvenko, O.
    Ishkanian, A.
    Abramowitz, M.
    Davicioni, E.
    Pollack, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3605 - 3605
  • [32] Accuracy validation for MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Vikal, Siddharth
    Guion, Peter
    Krieger, Axel
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND MODELING, 2010, 7625
  • [33] MRI-GUIDED BIOPSY IN ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Kinnaird, Adam
    Yerram, Nitin
    O'Connor, Luke
    Brisbane, Wayne
    Sharma, Vidit
    Chuang, Ryan
    Jayadevan, Rajiv
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Daneshvar, Michael
    Priester, Alan
    Delfin, Merdin
    Tran, Elizabeth
    Barsa, Danielle
    Sisk, Anthony
    Reiter, Robert
    Felker, Ely
    Raman, Steve
    Kwan, Lorna
    Choyke, Peter
    Merino, Maria
    Wood, Bradford
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    Marks, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E284 - E285
  • [34] MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient post colectomy
    Walker, Sidney P.
    Greenwood, Bernadette M.
    Malecha, Adam D.
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (09) : 30A - U44
  • [35] Accuracy analysis in MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy
    Helen Xu
    Andras Lasso
    Peter Guion
    Axel Krieger
    Aradhana Kaushal
    Anurag K. Singh
    Peter A. Pinto
    Jonathan Coleman
    Robert L. Grubb
    Jean-Baptiste Lattouf
    Cynthia Menard
    Louis L. Whitcomb
    Gabor Fichtinger
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2013, 8 : 937 - 944
  • [36] A Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection between Visual Estimation (Cognitive Registration) and Image Fusion (Software Registration) Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
    Khoo, Christopher C.
    Eldred-Evans, David
    Peters, Max
    van Son, Marieke
    van Rossum, Peter S. N.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Hosking-Jervis, Feargus
    Tanaka, Mariana Bertoncelli
    Reddy, Deepika
    Bass, Edward
    Powell, Laura
    Ahmad, Shahzad
    Pegers, Elizabeth
    Joshi, Suchita
    Sri, Denosshan
    Wong, Kathie
    Tam, Henry
    Hrouda, David
    Qazi, Hasan
    Gordon, Stephen
    McCracken, Stuart
    Winkler, Mathias
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (04): : 1075 - 1081
  • [37] Experiences with the MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate gland as second biopsy (rebiopsy)
    Moeckel, C.
    Porcellini, B.
    Haldemann, R.
    Koch, E.
    Hailemariam, S.
    Fehr, J. L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E796 - U687
  • [38] Design of a MRI Viewer Software for MRI-guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy
    Moon, Hyojeong
    Kim, Dae Gwan
    Seung, Sungmin
    Lee, Hyunseok
    2021 36TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON CIRCUITS/SYSTEMS, COMPUTERS AND COMMUNICATIONS (ITC-CSCC), 2021,
  • [39] Development and Preliminary Evaluation of a Motorized Needle Guide Template for MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Zhang, Elizabeth
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 (11) : 3019 - 3027
  • [40] Registration algorithms for interventional. MRI-guided treatment of the prostate
    Fei, BW
    Frinkley, K
    Wilson, DL
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND DISPLAY, 2003, 5029 : 192 - 201