The Structural Context of Team Learning: Effects of Organizational and Team Structure on Internal and External Learning

被引:144
作者
Bresman, Henrik [1 ]
Zellmer-Bruhn, Mary [2 ]
机构
[1] INSEAD, Singapore 138676, Singapore
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
learning; team learning; structure; group structure; group processes; multilevel research; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; TASK; MANAGEMENT; AUTONOMY; LEVEL; MODEL; WORK; LEADERSHIP;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1120.0783
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper reports on a study of structural antecedents to team learning. In a study of self-managed pharmaceutical research and development teams, we first find that more team-level structure is associated with more internal learning as well as more external learning. We then establish that more organizational-level structure is negatively associated with both internal and external learning. We find that psychological safety mediates the positive relationship between team structure and team learning, and that task autonomy constraints mediate the negative relationship between organizational structure and team learning. Investigating the interaction effect between team and organizational structure, we find, unexpectedly, that organizational structure supports external team learning under conditions of less team structure. Specifically, when teams have less team structure, the relationship between organizational structure and external team learning is positive. This structure substitutability finding suggests that although more organizational structure, on average, hurts external team learning, there are situations in which it helps. An important implication of the study is that multiple levels of structure, and their interactions, should be taken into consideration when assessing structural effects on team learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1120 / 1139
页数:20
相关论文
共 126 条
[31]   Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models [J].
Chan, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 83 (02) :234-246
[32]   The role of different levels of leadership in predicting self- and collective efficacy: Evidence for discontinuity [J].
Chen, GL ;
Bliese, PD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :549-556
[33]   ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE - ROLE OF STRATEGIC CHOICE [J].
CHILD, J .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 1972, 6 (01) :1-&
[34]   External activities and team effectiveness - Review and theoretical development [J].
Choi, JN .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2002, 33 (02) :181-208
[35]  
Christensen C.M., 1997, INNOVATORS DILEMMA
[36]   THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SELF-MANAGING TEAMS - A QUASI-EXPERIMENT [J].
COHEN, SG ;
LEDFORD, GE .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1994, 47 (01) :13-43
[37]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[38]  
CORDERY JL, 1991, ACAD MANAGE J, V34, P464, DOI 10.5465/256452
[39]   Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization [J].
Cummings, JN .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (03) :352-364
[40]  
Daft RichardL., 2008, Organization Theory and Design, V10th