Energy and thermal models for simulation of workload and resource management in computing systems

被引:19
|
作者
Piatek, Wojciech [1 ]
Oleksiak, Ariel [1 ,2 ]
Da Costa, Georges [3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Supercomp & Networking Ctr, Poznan, Poland
[2] Poznan Univ Tech, Inst Comp Sci, Poznan, Poland
[3] Univ Toulouse, Inst Comp Sci Res, Toulouse, France
关键词
Simulations; Thermal models; Energy-efficiency; Data centers; DATA CENTERS; TEMPERATURE; EFFICIENCY; LEAKAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.simpat.2015.04.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In the recent years, we have faced the evolution of high-performance computing (HPC) systems towards higher scale, density and heterogeneity. In particular, hardware vendors along with software providers, HPC centers, and scientists are struggling with the exascale computing challenge. As the density of both computing power and heat is growing, proper energy and thermal management becomes crucial in terms of overall system efficiency. Moreover, an accurate and relatively fast method to evaluate such large scale computing systems is needed. In this paper we present a way to model energy and thermal behavior of computing system. The proposed model can be used to effectively estimate system performance, energy consumption, and energy-efficiency metrics. We evaluate their accuracy by comparing the values calculated based on these models against the measurements obtained on real hardware. Finally, we show how the proposed models can be applied to workload scheduling and resource management in large scale computing systems by integrating them in the DCworms simulation framework. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 54
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficient resource management and workload allocation in fog-cloud computing paradigm in IoT using learning classifier systems
    Abbasi, Mahdi
    Yaghoobikia, Mina
    Rafiee, Milad
    Jolfaei, Alireza
    Khosravi, Mohammad R.
    COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 153 (153) : 217 - 228
  • [22] Economic models for resource management and scheduling in Grid computing
    Buyya, R
    Abramson, D
    Giddy, J
    Stockinger, H
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2002, 14 (13-15): : 1507 - 1542
  • [23] Adaptive workload management in cloud computing for service level agreements compliance and resource optimization
    Ghandour, Oumaima
    El Kafhali, Said
    Hanini, Mohamed
    COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 120
  • [24] Autonomous Lifecycle Management for Resource-Efficient Workload Orchestration for Green Edge Computing
    Guim, Francesc
    Metsch, Thijs
    Moustafa, Hassnaa
    Verrall, Timothy
    Carrera, David
    Cadenelli, Nicola
    Chen, Jiang
    Doria, David
    Ghadie, Chadie
    Prats, Raul Gonzalez
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GREEN COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2022, 6 (01): : 571 - 582
  • [25] Energy Efficient Resource Management for Cloud Computing Environment
    Selmy, Hend A.
    Alkabani, Yousra
    Mohamed, Hoda K.
    2014 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER ENGINEERING & SYSTEMS (ICCES), 2014, : 415 - 420
  • [26] Workload Characterization for Shared Resource Management in Multi-core systems
    Prabhu, Sapna
    Daruwala, Rohin
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2014, : 607 - 612
  • [27] Energy efficient resource allocation in distributed computing systems
    Khan, Samee Ullah
    Ardil, Cemal
    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 56 : 667 - 673
  • [28] Resource Constrained Failure Management in Networked Computing Systems
    Bommannavar, Praveen
    Bambos, Nicholas
    2012 IEEE GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE (GLOBECOM), 2012,
  • [29] Energy, exergy and computing efficiency based data center workload and cooling management
    Gupta, Rohit
    Asgari, Sahar
    Moazamigoodarzi, Hosein
    Down, Douglas G.
    Puri, Ishwar K.
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 299
  • [30] A Workload Balanced Approach for Resource Scheduling in Cloud Computing
    Kapur, Ritu
    2015 EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTEMPORARY COMPUTING (IC3), 2015, : 36 - 41