Economic freedom and corporate environmental responsibility: The role of small government and freedom from government regulation

被引:60
作者
Graafland, Johan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sustainabil Ctr CtR, Dept Econ, Room P1205,Warandelaan 2, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Corporate environmental responsibility; Economic freedom; Freedom from government regulation; Small government; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; CROSS-COUNTRY; TRADE GOOD; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; GROWTH; PANEL; GOVERNANCE; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.308
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In international scientific literature, it is argued from institutional theory that economic freedom stimulates corporate environmental responsibility. However, economic freedom comprises several different dimensions, such as government size, rule of law, open markets, and (freedom from) government regulation. Whereas previous literature has shown that rule of law and open markets stimulate corporate environmental responsibility, the impact of government size and government regulation on corporate environmental responsibility of companies located in different countries has yet not been explored. This paper contributes to scientific literature by researching the effects of these two dimensions of economic freedom on corporate environmental responsibility. We hypothesize that small government stimulates corporate environmental responsibility and that freedom from government regulation discourages it. Using panel data from ASSET4 for the corporate environmental responsibility of 5023 companies, and data of government size and government regulation from Fraser Institute and Heritage Foundation for 41 countries, the authors perform panel analysis for the period 2005-2014 to test the hypotheses. The estimation results show that both small size of government and freedom from government regulation decrease corporate environmental responsibility. The test results are robust for the type of economic freedom data (Fraser Institute or Heritage Foundation) used. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 258
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[31]   Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation [J].
Hull, Clyde Eirikur ;
Rothenberg, Sandra .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (07) :781-789
[32]   What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions [J].
Ioannou, Ioannis ;
Serafeim, George .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2012, 43 (09) :834-864
[33]   Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Europe: An Institutional Mirror or Substitute? [J].
Jackson, Gregory ;
Apostolakou, Androniki .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 94 (03) :371-394
[34]   The effect of economic freedom on growth revisited: New evidence on causality from a panel of countries 1970-1999 [J].
Justesen, Mogens K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 24 (03) :642-660
[35]  
Kinderman D. P., 2008, 508 M EIN CTR INT ST
[36]   'Free us up so we can be responsible!' The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 [J].
Kinderman, Daniel .
SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 10 (01) :29-57
[37]   Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction [J].
King, A ;
Lenox, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (02) :289-299
[38]  
lannou I, 2014, 11100 HARV BUS SCH
[39]   Corporate governance, social responsibility information disclosure, and enterprise value in China [J].
Liu, Xiang ;
Zhang, Chen .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :1075-1084
[40]  
Lundstrom S, 2003, EFFECTS EC FREEDOM G