Antioxidant Treatment Promotes Prostate Epithelial Proliferation in Nkx3.1 Mutant Mice

被引:16
|
作者
Martinez, Erin E. [1 ]
Anderson, Philip D. [1 ]
Logan, Monica [2 ]
Abdulkadir, Sarki A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol Microbiol & Immunol, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] Meharry Med Coll, Dept Biochem & Canc Biol, Nashville, TN 37208 USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Canc Biol, Nashville, TN USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 10期
关键词
OXIDATIVE STRESS; VITAMIN-E; N-ACETYLCYSTEINE; TARGET GENES; TRAMP MICE; CANCER; EXPRESSION; PREVENTION; CELL; SELENIUM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0046792
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Discordant results in preclinical and clinical trials have raised questions over the effectiveness of antioxidants in prostate cancer chemoprevention. Results from the large-scale Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT) showed that antioxidants failed to prevent, and in some cases promoted, prostate cancer formation in men without a history of the disease. One possible explanation for these alarming results is the notion that the effects of antioxidant treatment on the prostate are modified by specific, intrinsic genetic risk factors, causing some men to respond negatively to antioxidant treatment. Loss of expression of the homeobox transcription factor NKX3.1 in the prostate is frequently associated with human prostate cancer. Nkx3.1 mutant mice display prostatic hyperplasia and dysplasia and are used as a model of the early stages of prostate cancer initiation. While the mechanisms by which Nkx3.1 loss promotes prostate tumorigenicity are not completely understood, published data have suggested that elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) associated with Nkx3.1 loss may be a causative factor. Here we have tested this hypothesis by treating Nkx3.1 mutant mice with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 13 weeks post-weaning. Surprisingly, while NAC treatment decreased ROS levels in Nkx3.1 mutant mouse prostates, it failed to reduce prostatic epithelial hyperplasia/dysplasia. Rather, NAC treatment increased epithelial cell proliferation and promoted the expression of a pro-proliferative gene signature. These results show that ROS do not promote proliferation in the Nkx3.1-null prostate, but instead inhibit proliferation, suggesting that antioxidant treatment may encourage prostate epithelial cell proliferation early in prostate tumorigenesis. Our findings provide new insight that may help explain the increased prostate cancer risk observed with vitamin E treatment in the SELECT trial and emphasize the need for preclinical studies using accurate models of cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The loss of NKX3.1 expression in testicular – and prostate – cancers is not caused by promoter hypermethylation
    Guro E Lind
    Rolf I Skotheim
    Mario F Fraga
    Vera M Abeler
    Rui Henrique
    Fahri Saatcioglu
    Manel Esteller
    Manuel R Teixeira
    Ragnhild A Lothe
    Molecular Cancer, 4
  • [32] Loss of the NKX3.1 tumorsuppressor promotes the TMPRSS2-ERG fusion gene expression in prostate cancer
    Rajesh Thangapazham
    Francisco Saenz
    Shilpa Katta
    Ahmed A Mohamed
    Shyh-Han Tan
    Gyorgy Petrovics
    Shiv Srivastava
    Albert Dobi
    BMC Cancer, 14
  • [33] miR-378b Promotes Differentiation of Keratinocytes through NKX3.1
    Wang, Xi-liang
    Zhang, Tao
    Wang, Jing
    Zhang, Dian-bao
    Zhao, Feng
    Lin, Xue-wen
    Wang, Zhe
    Shi, Ping
    Pang, Xi-ning
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [34] PSA and NKX3.1: A Comparative IHC Study of Sensitivity and Specificity in Prostate Cancer
    Yu, C.
    Tacha, D.
    Bremer, R.
    Haas, T.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 254A - 254A
  • [35] Analysis of NKX3.1 expression in prostate cancer tissues and correlation with clinicopathologic features
    Aslan, G
    Irer, B
    Tuna, B
    Yorukoglu, K
    Saatcloglu, F
    Celebi, H
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2006, 202 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [36] DNA damage response (DDR) via NKX3.1 expression in prostate cells
    Erbaykent-Tepedelen, Burcu
    Karamil, Selda
    Gonen-Korkmaz, Ceren
    Korkmaz, Kemal S.
    JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2014, 141 : 26 - 36
  • [37] Functional analysis of NKX3.1 by RNA interference in LNCaP prostate cancer cells
    Possner, M.
    Kaulfuss, S.
    Strauss, A.
    Schulz, W.
    Ringert, R. H.
    Thelen, P.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2008, 7 (03) : 173 - 173
  • [38] Metformin Overcomes the Consequences of NKX3.1 Loss to Suppress Prostate Cancer Progression
    Papachristodoulou, Alexandros
    Heidegger, Isabel
    Virk, Renu K.
    Di Bernardo, Matteo
    Kim, Jaime Y.
    Laplaca, Caroline
    Picech, Florencia
    Schafer, Georg
    Castro, Guarionex Joel De
    Hibshoosh, Hanina
    Loda, Massimo
    Klocker, Helmut
    Rubin, Mark A.
    Zheng, Tian
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    Mckiernan, James M.
    Dutta, Aditya
    Abate-Shen, Cory
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 (04) : 361 - 372
  • [39] Integrating differentiation and cancer:: The Nkx3.1 homeobox gene in prostate organogenesis and carcinogenesis
    Abate-Shen, Cory
    Shen, Michael M.
    Gelmann, Edward
    DIFFERENTIATION, 2008, 76 (06) : 717 - 727
  • [40] Curcumin downregulates homeobox gene NKX3.1 in prostate cancer cell LNCaP
    Hui-na ZHANG~(2
    ~3Department of Urology Research
    ActaPharmacologicaSinica, 2007, (03) : 423 - 430