Interdecadal variation of ENSO predictability in multiple models

被引:10
|
作者
Tang, Youmin [1 ]
Deng, Ziwang [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaobing [1 ]
Cheng, Yanjie [1 ]
Chen, Dake [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ No British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada
[2] Columbia Univ, Lamont Doherty Earth Observ, Palisades, NY USA
[3] State Key Lab Satellite Ocean Environm Dynam, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1175/2008JCLI2193.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
In this study, El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) retrospective forecasts were performed for the 120 yr from 1881 to 2000 using three realistic models that assimilate the historic dataset of sea surface temperature (SST). By examining these retrospective forecasts and corresponding observations, as well as the oceanic analyses from which forecasts were initialized, several important issues related to ENSO predictability have been explored, including its interdecadal variability and the dominant factors that control the interdecadal variability. The prediction skill of the three models showed a very consistent interdecadal variation, with high skill in the late nineteenth century and in the middle-late twentieth century, and low skill during the period from 1900 to 1960. The interdecadal variation in ENSO predictability is in good agreement with that in the signal of interannual variability and in the degree of asymmetry of ENSO system. A good relationship was also identified between the degree of asymmetry and the signal of interannual variability, and the former is highly related to the latter. Generally, the high predictability is attained when ENSO signal strength and the degree of asymmetry are enhanced, and vice versa. The atmospheric noise generally degrades overall prediction skill, especially for the skill of mean square error, but is able to favor some individual prediction cases. The possible reasons why these factors control ENSO predictability were also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:4811 / 4833
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Interdecadal Shift of ENSO Properties in 1999/2000: A Review
    Hu, Zeng-Zhen
    Kumar, Arun
    Huang, Bohua
    Zhu, Jieshun
    L'Heureux, Michelle
    McPhaden, Michael J.
    Yu, Jin-Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (11) : 4441 - 4462
  • [32] Interdecadal variability of the ENSO teleconnection to the wintertime North Pacific
    O'Reilly, Christopher H.
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2018, 51 (9-10) : 3333 - 3350
  • [33] Interdecadal variation of ENSO teleconnections to surface air temperature over central India during summer monsoon onset
    Zhou, Zhen-Qiang
    Zhang, Renhe
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2025, 63 (01)
  • [34] Progress in ENSO prediction and predictability study
    Tang, Youmin
    Zhang, Rong-Hua
    Liu, Ting
    Duan, Wansuo
    Yang, Dejian
    Zheng, Fei
    Ren, Hongli
    Lian, Tao
    Gao, Chuan
    Chen, Dake
    Mu, Mu
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2018, 5 (06) : 826 - 839
  • [35] Interdecadal change in potential predictability of the Indian summer monsoon
    Goswami, BN
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (16) : L162081 - 4
  • [36] The linkage between two ENSO types/modes and the interdecadal changes of ENSO around the year 2000
    WANG Run
    REN Hong-Li
    Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2017, 10 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [37] An Eigen analysis of the interdecadal changes in the structure and frequency of ENSO mode
    An, SI
    Jin, FF
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (16) : 2573 - 2576
  • [38] Interdecadal change in the lagged relationship between the Victoria mode and ENSO
    XIE Wei
    FAN Guangzhou
    DING Ruiqiang
    LI Jianping
    LI Baosheng
    QIN Jianhuang
    ZHOU Xuejing
    AtmosphericandOceanicScienceLetters, 2019, 12 (04) : 294 - 301
  • [39] Interdecadal change in the relationship of Indochina Peninsula May precipitation to ENSO
    Wu, Renguang
    Zhu, Peijun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (04) : 2441 - 2455
  • [40] The interdecadal change of ENSO impact on wintertime East Asian climate
    Jia, XiaoJing
    Lin, Hai
    Ge, JingWen
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2015, 120 (23) : 11,918 - 11,935