Routine chest x-rays in intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:77
|
作者
Ganapathy, Anusoumya [1 ,2 ]
Adhikari, Neill K. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spiegelman, Jamie [4 ]
Scales, Damon C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Interdept Div Crit Care, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[4] Humber River Reg Hosp, Dept Med, Div Crit Care Med, Toronto, ON M3N 1N1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; RADIOGRAPHS; UTILITY; EFFICACY; ELIMINATION; ULTRASOUND; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/cc11321
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Chest x-rays (CXRs) are the most frequent radiological tests performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the utility of performing daily routine CXRs is unclear. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase (1948 to March 2011) for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and before-after observational studies comparing a strategy of routine CXRs to a more restrictive approach with CXRs performed to investigate clinical changes among critically ill adults or children. In duplicate, we extracted data on the CXR strategy, study quality and clinical outcomes (ICU and hospital mortality; duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU and hospital stay). Results: Nine studies (39,358 CXRs; 9,611 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Three trials (N = 870) of moderate to good quality provided information on the safety of a restrictive routine CXR strategy; only one trial systematically assessed for missed findings. Pooled data from trials showed no evidence of effect of a restrictive approach on ICU mortality (risk ratio [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84 to 1.28, P = 0.72; two trials, N = 776), hospital mortality (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.41, P = 0.91; two trials, N = 259), ICU length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.86 days, 95% CI -2.38 to 0.66 days, P = 0.27; three trials, N = 870), hospital length of stay (WMD -2.50 days, 95% CI -6.62 to 1.61 days, P = 0.23; two trials, N = 259), or duration of mechanical ventilation (WMD -0.30 days, 95% CI -1.48 to 0.89 days, P = 0.62; three trials, N = 705). Adding data from six observational studies, one of which systematically screened for missed findings, gave similar results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis did not detect any harm associated with a restrictive chest radiograph strategy. However, confidence intervals were wide and harm was not rigorously assessed. Therefore, the safety of abandoning routine CXRs in patients admitted to the ICU remains uncertain.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Markwart, Robby
    Saito, Hiroki
    Harder, Thomas
    Tomczyk, Sara
    Cassini, Alessandro
    Fleischmann-Struzek, Carolin
    Reichert, Felix
    Eckmanns, Tim
    Allegranzi, Benedetta
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (08) : 1536 - 1551
  • [32] Nursing resources and patient outcomes in intensive care units A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Ding, Jin
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Jiming
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (06) : E24507
  • [33] Prevalence and variability in use of physical restraints in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zare-Kaseb, Akbar
    Sarmadi, Sogand
    Sanaie, Neda
    Zeydi, Amir Emami
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2025, 38 (03)
  • [34] Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Robby Markwart
    Hiroki Saito
    Thomas Harder
    Sara Tomczyk
    Alessandro Cassini
    Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek
    Felix Reichert
    Tim Eckmanns
    Benedetta Allegranzi
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2020, 46 : 1536 - 1551
  • [35] Routine screening for colonization by Gram-negative bacteria in neonates at intensive care units for the prediction of sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seidel, J.
    Haller, S.
    Eckmanns, T.
    Harder, T.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2018, 99 (04) : 367 - 380
  • [36] VALUE OF ROUTINE PREOPERATIVE CHEST X-RAYS - A METAANALYSIS
    ARCHER, C
    LEVY, AR
    MCGREGOR, M
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1993, 40 (11): : 1022 - 1027
  • [37] ROUTINE ICU CHEST X-RAYS - AN AFFIRMATIVE STUDY
    HORST, HM
    FAGAN, B
    OBEID, FN
    VIJ, D
    BIVINS, BA
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1983, 23 (07): : 642 - 642
  • [38] THE NATURE OF THE LESIONS ENCOUNTERED IN ROUTINE CHEST X-RAYS
    SLATTERY, RV
    BEADENKOPF, WG
    LOOSLI, CG
    JOURNAL OF LABORATORY AND CLINICAL MEDICINE, 1950, 36 (04): : 617 - 631
  • [39] RESULTS OF ROUTINE CHEST X-RAYS IN REANIMATION OF NEWBORNS
    JOUVE, P
    HUGUET, JF
    UNAL, D
    BEZIAT, J
    BERGOIN, M
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE D ELECTROLOGIE ET DE MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE, 1970, 51 (1-2): : 67 - &
  • [40] Machine Learning Augmented Interpretation of Chest X-rays: A Systematic Review
    Ahmad, Hassan K.
    Milne, Michael R.
    Buchlak, Quinlan D.
    Ektas, Nalan
    Sanderson, Georgina
    Chamtie, Hadi
    Karunasena, Sajith
    Chiang, Jason
    Holt, Xavier
    Tang, Cyril H. M.
    Seah, Jarrel C. Y.
    Bottrell, Georgina
    Esmaili, Nazanin
    Brotchie, Peter
    Jones, Catherine
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (04)