Parameter dependences of the onset of turbulent liquid-jet breakup

被引:4
|
作者
Kerstein, Alan R. [1 ]
Movaghar, Amirreza [2 ]
Oevermann, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] 72 Lomitas Rd, Danville, CA 94526 USA
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Appl Mech, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
jets; multiphase flow; turbulent boundary layers; SURFACE;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2016.806
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Previous studies have predicted We(-2/5) dependence of the streamwise location at which primary breakup of turbulent liquid jets begins and We(-3/5) dependence of the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of droplets released at that location, where We is the jet Weber number. Measured deviations from these predictions were attributed to measurement uncertainties and to the simplicity of the analysis, which invoked turbulence inertial-range phenomenology. Here, it is proposed that breakup onset is instead controlled by the residual presence of the boundary-layer structure of the nozzle flow in the near field of the jet. Assuming that the size of the breakup inducing eddy is within the scale range of the log-law region. We(-1) dependence of both the onset location and the SMD at onset is predicted. These dependences agree with the available measurements more closely than those previously predicted. lb predict the dependences on the Reynolds number Re, either the friction velocity in conjunction with the Blasius friction law or the hulk velocity can he used, where the former yields Re-3/8 and Re-1/4 dependence of the onset location and the SMD at onset respectively, while the latter implies no Re dependence of either. 'f he latter result is consistent with the available measurements, but the boundary-layer analysis indicates that the velocity scaling should be based on the friction velocity rather than the bulk velocity, so the origin of the measured lack of Re dependence merits further investigation. A plausible hypothesis is that pressure effects associated with the transition from wall-bounded nozzle flow to jet free-slip boundary conditions induce a transient large-scale flow modification that counteracts the Re dependence of the nozzle flow while preserving the logarithmic flow structure near the jet surface. Notwithstanding the absence of direct evidence supporting this hypothesis, the new analysis and comparisons of its predictions with measurements suggest that transient effects such as the residual influence of the nozzle-flow structure are the likely explanations of the observed parameter dependences.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE BREAKUP AND ATOMIZATION OF A VISCOUS LIQUID JET
    易世君
    解茂昭
    陈白欣
    Acta Mechanica Sinica, 1996, 12 (02) : 124 - 134
  • [42] NONLINEAR BREAKUP OF A LAMINAR LIQUID JET
    LAFRANCE, P
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 1975, 18 (04) : 428 - 432
  • [43] Theory of the breakup of a liquid jet into drops
    S. K. Aslanov
    Technical Physics, 1999, 44 : 1386 - 1387
  • [44] Theory of the breakup of a liquid jet into drops
    Aslanov, SK
    TECHNICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (11) : 1386 - 1387
  • [45] BREAKUP OF A LIQUID JET IN A SWIRLING GAS
    LIAN, ZW
    LIN, SP
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1990, 2 (12): : 2134 - 2139
  • [46] Breakup & atomization of a viscous liquid jet
    Yi, Shijun
    Xie, Maozhao
    Chen, Baixin
    Acta Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao, 1996, 12 (02): : 124 - 134
  • [47] Surface breakup of a non-turbulent liquid jet injected into a high pressure gaseous crossflow
    Behzad, M.
    Ashgriz, N.
    Karney, B. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2016, 80 : 100 - 117
  • [48] An analysis of surface breakup induced by laser-generated cavitation bubbles in a turbulent liquid jet
    Zhou, Jiayi
    Andersson, Mats
    EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2020, 61 (12)
  • [49] An analysis of surface breakup induced by laser-generated cavitation bubbles in a turbulent liquid jet
    Jiayi Zhou
    Mats Andersson
    Experiments in Fluids, 2020, 61
  • [50] Influence of out-of-flatness on the performance of liquid-jet hammer
    College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun
    130026, China
    不详
    113015, China
    Intl. J. Earth Sci. Eng., 4 (1613-1620):