Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda

被引:151
|
作者
Pope, Jenny [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bond, Alan [2 ,4 ]
Morrison-Saunders, Angus [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Retief, Francois [2 ]
机构
[1] Integral Sustainabil, South Fremantle, WA 6162, Australia
[2] North West Univ, Sch Geo & Spatial Sci, ZA-2520 Potchefstroom, South Africa
[3] Curtin Univ Technol, Sustainabil Policy Inst, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Univ E Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] Murdoch Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
Impact assessment; State of the art; EIA; Research; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT SEA PRACTICE; PERSPECTIVES; PARTICIPATION; REFLECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Impact assessment has been in place for over 40 years and is now practised in some form in all but two of the world's nations. In this paper we reflect on the state of the art of impact assessment theory and practice, focusing on six well-established forms: EIA, SEA, policy assessment, SIA, HIA and sustainability assessment. We note that although the fundamentals of impact assessment have their roots in the US National Environmental Policy Act 1969 (NEPA) each branch of the field is distinct in also drawing on other theoretical and conceptual bases that in turn shape the prevailing discourse in each case, generating increasing degrees of specialisation within each sub-field. Against this backdrop, we consider the strengths and weaknesses of collective impact assessment practice, concluding that although there are substantial strengths, the plethora of specialist branches is generating a somewhat confusing picture and lack of clarity regarding how the pieces of the impact assessment jigsaw puzzle fit together. We use this review to suggest an overarching research agenda that will enable impact assessment to evolve in line with changing expectations for what it should deliver. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice
    Sun, Hang
    Yin, Shengkai
    ASSESSING WRITING, 2022, 51
  • [22] Language Aptitude: Advancing Theory, Testing, Research and Practice
    Zhang, Tiefu
    SYSTEM, 2021, 96
  • [23] Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research
    Mukherjee, Debmalya
    Lim, Weng Marc
    Kumar, Satish
    Donthu, Naveen
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 148 : 101 - 115
  • [24] Setting the research agenda
    Foegeding, E. Allen
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 2020, 85 (03) : 514 - 514
  • [25] Sustainability literature review research: advancing theory and practice
    Grougiou, Vassiliki
    Anagnostopoulou, Seraina
    Tingey-Holyoak, Joanne Louise
    SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (05) : 1017 - 1037
  • [26] Campus Culture Media Research Based on the Theory Of Agenda Setting
    Kong Yuyou
    ADVANCING KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING TECHNOLOGIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 152 - 155
  • [27] Reframing Research and Assessment Practices: Advancing an Antiracist and Anti-Ableist Research Agenda
    Johnson, Angela
    Barker, Elizabeth
    Cespedes, Marcos Viveros
    EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2024, 43 (03) : 95 - 105
  • [28] Practice-Based Evidence for Children and Adolescents: Advancing the Research Agenda in Schools
    Kratochwill, Thomas R.
    Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton
    Kazak, Anne E.
    Weisz, John R.
    Hood, Korey
    Vargas, Luis A.
    Banez, Gerard A.
    SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 41 (02) : 215 - 235
  • [29] Assessment Assemblage: Advancing Portfolio Practice through the Assessment Staging Theory
    Davis-Soylu, Heidi J.
    Peppler, Kylie A.
    Hickey, Daniel T.
    STUDIES IN ART EDUCATION, 2011, 52 (03) : 213 - 224
  • [30] Setting the research agenda for health services management practice: who decides?
    Davies, Stephen
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2010, 6 (01): : 103 - 113