A framework for analyzing participatory plant breeding approaches and results

被引:101
|
作者
Sperling, L [1 ]
Ashby, JA
Smith, ME
Weltzien, E
McGuire, S
机构
[1] CGIAR Systemwide Program Participatory Res & Gend, Rome, Italy
[2] Ctr Int Agr Trop, Rome, Italy
[3] CGIAR Systemwide Program Participatory Res & Gend, Cali, Colombia
[4] Ctr Int Agr Trop, Cali, Colombia
[5] Cornell Univ, Dept Plant Breeding, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Int Crops Res Inst Semi Arid Trop, Genet Resources & Enhancement Program, Bamako, Mali
[7] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Technol & Agr Dev Grp, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
plant breeding; farmer participation; client-driven; framework research;
D O I
10.1023/A:1017505323730
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Participatory Plant Breeding (PPB) involves scientists, farmers, and others, such as consumers, extensionists, vendors, industry, and rural cooperatives in plant breeding research. It is termed 'participatory' because many actors, and especially the users, can have a research role in all major stages of the breeding and selection process. While some have argued that commercial, private sector plant breeding has long been client-driven, or 'participatory' under another name, the application of 'PPB' to reach poor client groups, to breed for high-stress, heterogeneous environments and to incorporate diverse traits to meet specific client preferences is resulting in fundamental changes in the way plant genetic resources are being managed. PPB merits analysis as a separate approach. The notion of 'PPB' is a relatively recent one: detailed inventories show that most of the 65 'longer-term' cases have begun within the last 10 years, whether they were located in public sector or non-governmental crop improvement programs. With such 'newness' comes a wealth of terminology and divergent technical, social and organizational strategies under the general rubric of 'PPB'. This article aims to set up a framework for differentiating among PPB approaches. Only by discriminating among cases can one understand how each PPB approach can lead to a different outcome, and so be able to make informed choices about which approach to pursue. The key variables explored for discriminating among PPB approaches include: the institutional context, the bio-social environment, the goals set, and the kind of 'participation' achieved, (including the stage and degree of participation and the roles different actors undertake). It is only when these variables are clearly described that current and potential practitioners can start to link the 'type of PPB' employed (method and organizational forms) with the type of impacts achieved. An ending illustration of ongoing PPB programs suggests the practical utility of this 'PPB framework'.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 450
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Approaches to Breeding Soundness Examination and Interpretation of Results
    Varner, Dickson D.
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2016, 43 : S37 - S44
  • [42] The Value of Farmer-based Participatory Plant Breeding for Organic Systems
    Colley, Micaela
    Navazio, John P.
    Zystro, Jared
    HORTSCIENCE, 2013, 48 (09) : S75 - S75
  • [43] Participatory plant breeding in France - From annual plants to woody plants
    La sélection participative en France: Des plantes annuelles aux ligneux
    1600, Ecole Nationale du Genie Rural des Eaux et des Forets (66):
  • [44] Participatory Plant Breeding to develop biofortified upland rice for marginal environments
    Castro-Pacheco, Sergio Antonio
    Rabekijana, Ravo
    Andriamiarana, Mahevanirina
    Raveloson, Harinjaka
    Rakotomalala, Joel
    Ramanantsoanirina, Alain
    Garin, Vincent
    Grenier, Cecile
    vom Brocke, Kirsten
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2024, 60
  • [45] Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research
    Ceccarelli, Salvatore
    Grando, Stefania
    EUPHYTICA, 2007, 155 (03) : 349 - 360
  • [46] Improvement of Honduran maize landraces by applying participatory plant breeding methodologies
    Carlos Rosas-Sotomayor, Juan
    Gallardo-Guzman, Omar
    Jimenez-Torres, Jose
    AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA, 2006, 17 (03): : 383 - 392
  • [47] Participatory plant breeding in maize: A case study from Gujarat, India
    Witcombe, JR
    Joshi, A
    Goyal, SN
    EUPHYTICA, 2003, 130 (03) : 413 - 422
  • [48] Participatory Plant Breeding with Traders and Farmers for White Pea Bean in Ethiopia
    Assefa, T.
    Sperling, L.
    Dagne, B.
    Argaw, W.
    Tessema, D.
    Beebe, S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2014, 20 (05): : 497 - 512
  • [49] Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling for Flexible Experiments in Decentralized Participatory Plant Breeding
    Riviere, Pierre
    Dawson, Julie C.
    Goldringer, Isabelle
    David, Olivier
    CROP SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (03) : 1053 - 1067
  • [50] Farmer participatory crop improvement .3. Participatory plant breeding, a case study for rice in Nepal
    Sthapit, BR
    Joshi, KD
    Witcombe, JR
    EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1996, 32 (04) : 479 - 496