Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice

被引:41
|
作者
Mandelblatt, JS
Ganz, PA
Kahn, KL
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Care Res & Policy, Dept Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[4] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] RAND, Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2614
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer is an important disease, and health care services have the potential to improve the quality and quantity of life for cancer patients. The delivery of these services also has recently been well codified. Given this framework, cancer care presents a unique opportunity for clinicians to develop and test outcome measures across diverse practice settings. Recently, the institute of Medicine released a report reviewing the quality of cancer care in the United States and called for further development and monitoring of quality indicators. Thus, as we move into the 21st century, professional and regulatory agencies will be seeking to expand process measures and develop and validate outcomes-oriented measures for cancer and other diseases. Far such measures to be clinically relevant and feasible, it is key that the oncology community lake an active leadership role in this process, To set the stage for such activities, this article first reviews broad methodologic concerns involved in selecting measures of the quality of care, using breast cancer to exemplify key issues. We then use the case of breast cancer to review the different phases of cancer care and provide examples of phase-specific measures that after careful operationalization, testing, and validation, could be used as the basis of an agenda for measuring the quality of; breast cancer care in oncology practice. The diffusion of process and outcome measures into practice; the practicality, reliability, and validity of these measures; and the impact that these indicators have on practice patterns and the health of populations will be key to evaluating the success of such quality-of-care paradigms. Ultimately, improved quality of care should translate into morbidity and mortality reductions. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2614 / 2622
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mental illness stigma as a quality-of-care problem
    Knaak, Stephanie
    Patten, Scott
    Ungar, Thomas
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 2 (10): : 863 - 864
  • [42] THE RELIABILITY OF SIMULATED CLIENTS QUALITY-OF-CARE RATINGS
    LEON, FR
    QUIROZ, G
    BRAZZODURO, A
    STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 1994, 25 (03) : 184 - 190
  • [43] Feasibility and compliance of automated measurement of quality of life in oncology practice
    Wright, EP
    Selby, PJ
    Crawford, M
    Gillibrand, A
    Johnston, C
    Perren, TJ
    Rush, R
    Smith, A
    Velikova, G
    Watson, K
    Gould, A
    Cull, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (02) : 374 - 382
  • [44] Integrated oncology care: Measuring AOCNP practice outcomes.
    Much, J
    Harper, G
    Casey, K
    Wasser, T
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2006, 33 (02) : 403 - 403
  • [45] Quality-of-care data from managed-care organizations
    Palumbo, FB
    Mullins, CD
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (06): : 443 - 444
  • [46] Health Literacy Measurement: A Proposed Research Agenda
    Pleasant, Andrew
    McKinney, Julie
    Rikard, R. V.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 : 11 - 21
  • [47] Measuring supportive care in medical oncology practice: Lessons learned from the quality oncology practice initiative
    McNiff, Kristen K.
    Neuss, Michael N.
    Jacobson, Joseph O.
    Eisenberg, Peter D.
    Kadlubek, Pamela
    Simone, Joseph V.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (23) : 3832 - 3837
  • [48] Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) certification applicants and outcomes
    Gilmore, T.
    Neuss, M. N.
    Kadlubek, P.
    Jacobson, J. O.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [49] Hemodialysis Facility-Based Quality-of-Care Indicators and Facility-Specific Patient Outcomes
    Lacson, Eduardo, Jr.
    Wang, Weiling
    Lazarus, J. Michael
    Hakim, Raymond M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2009, 54 (03) : 490 - 497
  • [50] MEDIA SEEK ACCESS TO QUALITY-OF-CARE RECORDS
    HOLTHAUS, D
    HOSPITALS, 1989, 63 (16): : 39 - 40