Proposed agenda for the measurement of quality-of-care outcomes in oncology practice

被引:41
|
作者
Mandelblatt, JS
Ganz, PA
Kahn, KL
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Inst Hlth Care Res & Policy, Dept Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[3] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[4] Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90034 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] RAND, Hlth Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2614
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer is an important disease, and health care services have the potential to improve the quality and quantity of life for cancer patients. The delivery of these services also has recently been well codified. Given this framework, cancer care presents a unique opportunity for clinicians to develop and test outcome measures across diverse practice settings. Recently, the institute of Medicine released a report reviewing the quality of cancer care in the United States and called for further development and monitoring of quality indicators. Thus, as we move into the 21st century, professional and regulatory agencies will be seeking to expand process measures and develop and validate outcomes-oriented measures for cancer and other diseases. Far such measures to be clinically relevant and feasible, it is key that the oncology community lake an active leadership role in this process, To set the stage for such activities, this article first reviews broad methodologic concerns involved in selecting measures of the quality of care, using breast cancer to exemplify key issues. We then use the case of breast cancer to review the different phases of cancer care and provide examples of phase-specific measures that after careful operationalization, testing, and validation, could be used as the basis of an agenda for measuring the quality of; breast cancer care in oncology practice. The diffusion of process and outcome measures into practice; the practicality, reliability, and validity of these measures; and the impact that these indicators have on practice patterns and the health of populations will be key to evaluating the success of such quality-of-care paradigms. Ultimately, improved quality of care should translate into morbidity and mortality reductions. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2614 / 2622
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quality-of-Care Processes in Geriatric Assessment Units: Principles, Practice, and Outcomes
    Kergoat, Marie-Jeanne
    Latour, Judith
    Lebel, Paule
    Leclerc, Bernard-Simon
    Leduc, Nicole
    Beland, Francois
    Berg, Katherine
    Presse, Nancy
    Tanon, Anais
    Bolduc, Aline
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 13 (05) : 459 - 463
  • [2] Patient Centeredness and Engagement in Quality-of-Care Oncology Research
    Clauser, Steven B.
    Gayer, Christopher
    Murphy, Elizabeth
    Majhail, Navneet S.
    Baker, K. Scott
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2015, 11 (03) : 176 - +
  • [3] Advancing Performance Measurement in Oncology: Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Participation and Quality Outcomes
    Campion, Francis X.
    Larson, Leanne R.
    Kadlubek, Pamela J.
    Earle, Craig C.
    Neuss, Michael N.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (03) : 31S - 35S
  • [4] The Importance of Accurate Data in Quality-of-Care Measurement
    Rosof, Bernard
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 157 (05) : 379 - 380
  • [5] Alternative Payment Models in Medica Oncology: Assessing Quality-of-Care Outcomes Under Partial Capitation
    Ems, Derek
    Murty, Sharanya
    Loy, Bryan
    Gallagher, Judith
    Happe, Laura E.
    Rogstad, Teresa L.
    Finnel, Debra
    Fernandez, Jimmy D.
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2018, 11 (07): : 371 - 378
  • [6] Dissemination of Quality-of-Care Research Findings to Breast Oncology Surgeons
    Shiovitz, Stacey
    Gay, Ashley
    Morris, Arden
    Graff, John J.
    Katz, Steven J.
    Hawley, Sarah T.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2011, 7 (04) : 257 - 262
  • [7] The quality-of-care agenda in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings
    Neilson, Matthew
    Leatherman, Sheila
    Syed, Shamsuzzoha
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2021, 99 (03) : 170 - +
  • [8] American Society of Clinical Oncology Symposium Highlights Quality-of-Care Issues
    Printz, Carrie
    CANCER, 2015, 121 (04) : 489 - 489
  • [9] Quality of care in the rural context: A proposed research agenda
    Rosenblatt, RA
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2002, 18 : 176 - 185
  • [10] Quality-of-care indicators for oncology management: an analysis of Asia-Pacific healthcare and oncology indicators
    Kanesvaran, R.
    Wong, E. Y. T.
    Keam, B.
    Prasongsook, N.
    Malhotra, H.
    Blay, J. -y.
    ESMO OPEN, 2025, 10 (03)