Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances

被引:16
|
作者
Martins, Renato Parsekian [1 ,2 ]
da Rosa Martins, Joel Claudio
Martins, Lidia Parsekian [3 ]
Buschang, Peter H. [4 ]
机构
[1] UNESP, FAEPO, BR-14801320 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[2] GESTOS, FAMOSP, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[3] UNESP, Fac Odontol Araraquara, BR-14801320 Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[4] Baylor Coll Dent, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.022
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to differentiate the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects to better understand orthodontic treatment. We evaluated the treatment changes associated with the bionator and the removable headgear splint (RHS). Methods: The sample comprised 51 consecutively treated Class II patients from 1 office who had all been successfully treated with either a bionator (n = 17) or an RHS appliance (n = 17). Class II patients waiting to start treatment later served as controls (n = 17). A modified version of the Johnston pitchfork analysis was used to quantify the dentoalveolar and skeletal contributions to the anteroposterior correction at the levels of the molars and the incisors. Results: Both appliances significantly improved anteroposterior molar relationships (2.15 mm for the bionator, 2.27 mm for the RHS), primarily by dentoalveolar modifications (1.49 and 2.36 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively), with greater maxillary molar distalization in the RHS group. Overjet relationships also improved significantly compared with the controls (3.11 and 2.12 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively), due primarily to retroclination of the maxillary incisors (2.2 and 2.38 mm for the bionator and the RHS, respectively). The differences between overall corrections and dentoalveolar modifications for both molar and overjet relationships were explained by skeletal responses, with the bionator group showing significantly greater anterior mandibular displacement than the RHS group. Conclusions: The bionator and the RHS effectively corrected the molar relationships and overjets of Class II patients primarily by dentoalveolar changes. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 732-41)
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 741
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study of the treatment effects of bionator and bite jumping appliances on Class II malocclusions
    Sakai, Naoko
    Miyazawa, Ken
    Tsutsui, Takeo
    Tabuchi, Masako
    Shibata, Momoko
    Goto, Shigemi
    ORTHODONTIC WAVES, 2016, 75 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [22] Correction of a Class II Malocclusion with the Bionator: Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Eff ects - A Cephalometric Long-Term Study
    Rudzki, I. M.
    Euba, A.
    Noachtar, R.
    Stenmans, B.
    Reiter, I.
    Coler, R.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2012, 44 (03): : 151 - 162
  • [23] Nonextraction treatment of a Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with headgear and functional appliances
    Mosling, MS
    Fogle, LL
    GloecknerDemro, J
    Bigelow, HF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1997, 112 (04) : 372 - 377
  • [24] Comparative study of the Frankel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion
    de Almeida, MR
    Henriques, JFC
    Ursi, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 121 (05) : 458 - 466
  • [25] The skeletal and dental effects of Hanks Herbst versus twin block appliances for class II correction in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial
    Pacha, Moaiyad M.
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    Shagmani, Muftah
    Johal, Ama
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [26] Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions
    Bilbo, E. Erin
    Marshall, Steven D.
    Southard, Karin A.
    Allareddy, Verrasathpurush
    Holton, Nathan
    Thames, Allyn M.
    Otsby, Marlene S.
    Southard, Thomas E.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2018, 88 (05) : 530 - 537
  • [28] Skeletal and dentoalveolar contributions during Class II correction with Forsus™ FRD appliances Quantitative evaluation
    George, Ann Sara
    Ganapati Durgekar, Sujala
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2022, 83 (02): : 87 - 98
  • [29] Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusion treatment with cervical headgear and mandibular fixed appliances
    Freitas, M. R.
    Lima, D. V.
    Freitas, K. M. S.
    Janson, G.
    Henriques, J. F. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2008, 30 (05) : 477 - 482
  • [30] Long-term skeletal and dental effects and treatment timing for functional appliances in Class II malocclusion
    Franchi, Lorenzo
    Pavoni, Chiara
    Faltin, Kurt, Jr.
    McNamara, James A., Jr.
    Cozza, Paola
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (02) : 334 - 340