Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility in Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Systems Approach

被引:135
|
作者
Mason, Chris [1 ]
Simmons, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Business & Enterprise, Melbourne, Vic 3122, Australia
[2] Univ Liverpool, Liverpool Management Sch, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
关键词
Corporate governance; Corporate social responsibility; Stakeholder systems; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; BUSINESS ETHICS; CSR; MANAGEMENT; ENGAGEMENT; DISCOURSE; SALIENCE; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-012-1615-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Current research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) illustrates the growing sense of discord surrounding the 'business of doing good' (Dobers and Springett, Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage 17(2):63-69, 2010). Central to these concerns is that CSR risks becoming an over-simplified and peripheral part of corporate strategy. Rather than transforming the dominant corporate discourse, it is argued that CSR and related concepts are limited to "emancipatory rhetoricaEuro broken vertical bar defined by narrow business interests and serve to curtail interests of external stakeholders." (Banerjee, Crit Sociol 34(1):52, 2008). The paper addresses gaps in the literature and challenges current thinking on corporate governance and CSR by offering a new conceptual framework that responds to the concerns of researchers and practitioners. The limited focus of existing analyses is extended by a holistic approach to corporate governance and social responsibility that integrates company, shareholder and wider stakeholder concerns. A defensive stance is avoided by delineating key stages of the governance process and aligning profit centred and social responsibility concerns to produce a business-based rationale for minimising risk and mainstreaming CSR.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Synergies and Interrelationships
    Jamali, Dima
    Safieddine, Assem M.
    Rabbath, Myriam
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2008, 16 (05) : 443 - 459
  • [32] THE INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
    Lojpur, Andjelko
    Draskovic, Veselin
    MONTENEGRIN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 9 (01) : 27 - 43
  • [33] Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance and Investment Efficiency
    Huang, Zhilan
    Zhao, Xine
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND INNOVATIVE EDUCATION (MSIE), 2016, 60 : 440 - 443
  • [34] The effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A stakeholder approach
    Yoon, Borham
    Chung, Yeasun
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2018, 37 : 89 - 96
  • [35] The Implementation Model of Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the Stakeholder Approach
    Wang, Weige
    Sun, Mingbo
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 1131 - 1135
  • [36] A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance
    Taghian, Mehdi
    D'Souza, Clare
    Polonsky, Michael J.
    SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY JOURNAL, 2015, 11 (02) : 340 - +
  • [37] The Corporate Social Responsibility of Ukrainian Agroholdings: the Stakeholder Approach Revisited
    Taras Gagalyuk
    Vladislav Valentinov
    Franziska Schaft
    Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2018, 31 : 675 - 698
  • [38] The Corporate Social Responsibility of Ukrainian Agroholdings: the Stakeholder Approach Revisited
    Gagalyuk, Taras
    Valentinov, Vladislav
    Schaft, Franziska
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2018, 31 (06) : 675 - 698
  • [39] Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation for Corporate Social Responsibility
    Bryan Hong
    Zhichuan Li
    Dylan Minor
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 136 : 199 - 213
  • [40] Multinational companies and the corporate social responsibility at home: the stakeholder approach
    Kim, Eun Woo
    Choe, Soonkyoo
    Kwak, Jooyoung
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2019, 57 (09) : 2383 - 2400