Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for osteoporosis screening in US postmenopausal women: is it cost-effective?

被引:16
|
作者
Yang, J. [1 ]
Cosman, F. [2 ]
Stone, P. W. [3 ]
Li, M. [4 ]
Nieves, J. W. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Inst Social & Econ Res & Policy ISERP, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Leonard D Schaeffer Ctr Hlth Policy & Econ, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
[6] Hosp Special Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Epidemiol, 630 West 168th St,IHN PH 1512, New York, NY 10032 USA
[8] Columbia Univ, Inst Human Nutr, 630 West 168th St,IHN PH 1512, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Osteoporosis; Postmenopausal women; Vertebral fracture; Vertebral fracture assessment; X-RAY-ABSORPTIOMETRY; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONVERTEBRAL FRACTURES; HIP FRACTURE; ALENDRONATE THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-MEN; RISK; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-020-05588-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is cost-effective when it was incorporated in the routine screening for osteoporosis in community-dwelling women aged >= 65 years, which support guidelines, such as the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment. Introduction To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of VFA as a screening tool to reduce future fracture risk in US community-dwelling women aged >= 65 years. Methods An individual-level state-transition cost-effectiveness model from a healthcare perspective was constructed using derived data from published literature. The time horizon was lifetime. Five screening strategies were compared, including no screening at all, central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) only, VFA only, central DXA followed by VFA if the femoral neck T-score (FN-T) <= - 1.5, or if the FN-T <= - 1.0. Various initiation ages and rescreening intervals were evaluated. Oral bisphosphonate treatment for 5-year periods was assumed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (2017 US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained) were used as the outcome measure. Results The incorporation of VFA slightly increased life expectancy by 0.1 years and reduced the number of subsequent osteoporotic fractures by 3.7% and 7.7% compared with using DXA alone and no screening, respectively, leading to approximately 30 billion dollars saved. Regardless of initiation ages and rescreening intervals, central DXA followed by VFA if the FN-T <= - 1.0 was most cost-effective ($40,792 per QALY when the screening is initiated at age 65 years and with rescreening every 5 years). Results were robust to change in VF incidence and medication costs. Conclusion In women aged >= 65 years, VFA is cost-effective when it was incorporated in routine screening for osteoporosis. Our findings support the National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) guidelines for the diagnostic use of VFA as an important addition to fracture risk assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:2321 / 2335
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevalence of vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities evaluated by DXA-assisted vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a population-based study of postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study
    E. Kanterewicz
    E. Puigoriol
    J. García-Barrionuevo
    L. del Rio
    M. Casellas
    P. Peris
    Osteoporosis International, 2014, 25 : 1455 - 1464
  • [42] Ibandronate IV injection is cost-effective in the treatment of UK women with postmenopausal osteoporosis who are intolerant to oral bisphosphonates
    Lynch, N. O.
    Earnshaw, S.
    Graham, C.
    Patroe, V.
    Boisdron, J.
    Middelhoven, H.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 : 529 - 529
  • [43] A Comparison of US and Canadian Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Strategies in Postmenopausal Women
    Crandall, Carolyn J.
    Larson, Joseph
    Manson, Joann E.
    Cauley, Jane A.
    LaCroix, Andrea Z.
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    Datta, Mridul
    Sattari, Maryam
    Schousboe, John T.
    Leslie, William D.
    Ensrud, Kristine E.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2019, 34 (04) : 607 - 615
  • [44] NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS BY WOMEN WITH POSTMENOPAUSAL VERTEBRAL OSTEOPOROSIS
    Gavriliuc, M.
    Gherman, D.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 20 : 66 - 66
  • [45] THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE OSTEOPOROSIS SCREENING STRATEGIES FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
    Nayak, Smita
    Greenspan, Susan
    Roberts, Mark
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 399 - 399
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal Japanese women
    Nagata-Kobayashi, S
    Shimbo, T
    Fukui, T
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2002, 20 (06) : 350 - 357
  • [47] Cost-Effectiveness of Different Screening Strategies for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
    Nayak, Smita
    Roberts, Mark S.
    Greenspan, Susan L.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (11) : 751 - U176
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal Japanese women
    Shizuko Nagata-Kobayashi
    Takuro Shimbo
    Tsuguya Fukui
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 2002, 20 : 350 - 357
  • [49] Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in young postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis
    Devogelaer, J. P.
    Roux, C.
    Isaia, G.
    Andia, J. B. Cannata
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2007, 22 : S335 - S335
  • [50] Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of vertebral fracture in young postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis
    Roux, C.
    Isaia, G.
    Andia, J. B. Cannata
    Devogelaer, J.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2007, 66 : 681 - 681