Comparison of Direct Digital Mammography, Computed Radiography, and Film-Screen in the French National Breast Cancer Screening Program

被引:43
|
作者
Seradour, Brigitte [1 ]
Heid, Patrice [1 ]
Esteve, Jacques [2 ]
机构
[1] ARCADES Assoc Rech & Depistage Canc Sein Col Uter, F-13395 Marseille 10, France
[2] Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
关键词
breast cancer; breast cancer screening; breast imaging; digital mammography; film-screen mammography; HORMONE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; ACCURACY; DENSITY; IMPACT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.12.10419
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to compare the performance of digital mammography using hardcopy image reading against film-screen mammography in a French national routine population-based screening program with a decentralized organization. The French context offered the opportunity to examine separately computed radiography and direct digital mammography performances in a large cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study includes 23,423 direct digital mammography, 73,320 computed radiography, and 65,514 film-screen mammography examinations performed by 123 facilities in Bouches du Rhone, France, for women 50-74 years old between 2008 and 2010. We compared abnormal mammography findings rate, cancer detection rate, and tumor characteristics among the technologies. RESULTS. Abnormal finding rates were higher for direct digital mammography (7.78% vs 6.11% for film-screen mammography and 5.34% for computed radiography), particularly in younger women and in denser breasts. Cancer detection rates were also higher for direct digital mammography (0.71% vs 0.66% for film-screen mammography and 0.55% for computed radiography). The contrast between detection rates was stronger for ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast density was the main factor explaining the differences in detection rates. For direct digital mammography only, the detection rate was clearly higher in dense breasts whatever the age (odds ratio, 2.20). Except for grade, no differences were recorded concerning tumor characteristics in which the proportion of high-grade tumors was larger for direct digital mammography for invasive and in situ tumors. CONCLUSION. Direct digital mammography has a higher detection rate than film-screen mammography in dense breasts and for tumors of high grade. This latter association warrants further study to measure the impact of technology on efficacy of screening. The data indicate that computed radiography detects fewer tumors than film-screen mammography in most instances.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, S
    Bick, U
    von Heyden, H
    Diekmann, F
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2003, 175 (06): : 775 - 779
  • [42] Full-field digital mammography vs film-screen mammography in patients with microcalcifications: Comparison of detection and characterization
    Fischer, U
    Baum, FT
    Luftner-Nagel, S
    Obenauer, S
    Von Heyden, D
    Grabbe, EH
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 : 201 - 201
  • [43] Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography of breast cancer
    Lewin, JM
    D'Orsi, CJ
    Hendrick, RE
    Moss, LJ
    Isaacs, PK
    Karellas, A
    Cutter, GR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [44] Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography
    Bosmans, Hilde
    De Hauwere, An
    Lemmens, Kim
    Zanca, Federica
    Thierens, Hubert
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Herck, Koen
    Van Steen, Andre
    Martens, Patrick
    Bleyen, Luc
    Vande Putte, Gretel
    Kellen, Eliane
    Mortier, Griet
    Van Limbergen, Erik
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (10) : 2891 - 2898
  • [45] Selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography of the hands and feet: A subjective comparison
    Piraino, DW
    Davros, WJ
    Lieber, M
    Richmond, BJ
    Schils, JP
    Recht, MP
    Grooff, PN
    Belhobek, GH
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (01) : 177 - 184
  • [46] Technical and clinical breast cancer screening performance indicators for computed radiography versus direct digital radiography
    Hilde Bosmans
    An De Hauwere
    Kim Lemmens
    Federica Zanca
    Hubert Thierens
    Chantal Van Ongeval
    Koen Van Herck
    Andre Van Steen
    Patrick Martens
    Luc Bleyen
    Gretel Vande Putte
    Eliane Kellen
    Griet Mortier
    Erik Van Limbergen
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 2891 - 2898
  • [47] Comparing the visualization of microcalcifications with direct magnification in digital full-field mammography vs. film-screen mammography
    Diekmann, F
    Diekmann, S
    Bick, U
    Rogalla, P
    Blohmer, JU
    Winzer, KJ
    Hamm, B
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2002, 174 (03): : 297 - 300
  • [48] Transition From Film to Digital Mammography Impact for Breast Cancer Screening Through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program
    van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
    van Lier, Lisanne
    Schechter, Clyde B.
    Ekwueme, Donatus U.
    Royalty, Janet
    Miller, Jacqueline W.
    Near, Aimee M.
    Cronin, Kathleen A.
    Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M.
    Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 48 (05) : 535 - 542
  • [49] Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis
    Farber, Rachel
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Wortley, Sally
    Jacklyn, Gemma
    Marinovich, Michael L.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Bell, Katy
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (01): : 16 - 26
  • [50] Comparison of Digital and Screen-Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Song, Soo Yeon
    Park, Boyoung
    Hong, Eri
    Kim, Min Jung
    Lee, Eun Hye
    Jun, Jae Kwan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2019, 22 (02) : 311 - 325