Comparison of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and FOLFIRINOX in metastatic pancreatic cancer

被引:4
|
作者
Han, Sung Yong [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Dong Uk [1 ,2 ]
Seol, Young Mi [3 ]
Kim, Suk [4 ]
Lee, Nam Kyung [4 ]
Hong, Seung Baek [4 ]
Seo, Hyung-Il [5 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan 49241, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Div Gastroenterol, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan 49241, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Hematol Oncol, Busan 49241, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Radiol, South, Busan 49241, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Surg, Busan 49241, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Metastatic pancreatic carcinoma; Chemotherapy; FOLFIRINOX; Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine; Predict marker; Adverse event; SUPPRESSOR-CELLS; NEUTROPHILS; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v8.i17.3718
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA) and modified FOLFIRINOX (FFX) have been widely used as standard first-line treatment in pancreatic cancer. However, it is unclear which regimen is more efficacious. AIM To evaluate a retrospective analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of FFX and GA as first-line chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed and compared outcomes in 101 patients who presented with pancreatic cancer and were treated with either GA (n= 54) or FFX (n= 47). Moreover, we performed subgroup analysis based on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. RESULTS There were no significant differences between two groups in baseline characteristics, except for the ECOG performance status. The median progression-free survival (PFS) (6.43 movs4.90 mo,P= 0.058) was comparable between two groups; however, median overall survival (OS) (10.17 movs6.93 mo,P= 0.008) was longer in patients who received GA regimen. In patients with ECOG 0 (PFS: 8.93 movs5.43 mo,P= 0.002; OS: 16.10 movs6.97 mo,P= 0.000) and those with NLR < 3 (PFS: 8.10 movs6.57 mo,P= 0.008; OS: 12.87 movs9.93 mo,P= 0.002), GA regimen showed higher efficacy. CONCLUSION GA regimen may be recommended to the patients with NLR < 3 or ECOG 0 status although GA and FFX showed comparable efficacy outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3718 / 3729
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel including sequential treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching approach
    Chun, Jung Won
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Kim, Joo Seong
    Park, Namyoung
    Huh, Gunn
    Cho, In Rae
    Paik, Woo Hyun
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Comparison between FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel including sequential treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching approach
    Jung Won Chun
    Sang Hyub Lee
    Joo Seong Kim
    Namyoung Park
    Gunn Huh
    In Rae Cho
    Woo Hyun Paik
    Ji Kon Ryu
    Yong-Tae Kim
    BMC Cancer, 21
  • [23] Second-line treatment of modified FOLFIRINOX or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Ozaka, Masato
    Sasaki, Takashi
    Yamada, Ikuhiro
    Kanata, Ryo
    Akiyama, Dai
    Katagiri, Tomoko
    Takano, Koichi
    Matsuyama, Masato
    Sasahira, Naoki
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04)
  • [24] Comparison of treatment patterns and economic outcomes among metastatic pancreatic cancer patients initiated on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX
    McBride, Ali
    Bonafede, Machaon
    Cai, Qian
    Princic, Nicole
    Tran, Oth
    Pelletier, Corey
    Parisi, Monika
    Patel, Manish
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 10 (10) : 1153 - 1160
  • [25] Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: our experience
    Mare, M.
    Munao, S.
    Germana, S.
    Colarossi, C.
    Sciacca, D.
    Giuffrida, D.
    Giannone, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28
  • [26] Comparison between FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel including sequential treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching approach
    Chun, Jung Won
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Kim, Joo Seong
    Park, Namyoung
    Huh, Gunn
    Cho, In Rae
    Paik, Woo Hyun
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 118 - 118
  • [27] NALIRIFOX, FOLFIRINOX, and Gemcitabine With Nab-Paclitaxel as First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
    Nichetti, Federico
    Rota, Simone
    Ambrosini, Paolo
    Pircher, Chiara
    Gusmaroli, Eleonora
    Busset, Michele Droz Dit
    Pusceddu, Sara
    Sposito, Carlo
    Coppa, Jorgelina
    Morano, Federica
    Pietrantonio, Filippo
    Di Bartolomeo, Maria
    Mariani, Luigi
    Mazzaferro, Vincenzo
    de Braud, Filippo
    Niger, Monica
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [28] Pharmacoethnicity of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoon Suk Lee
    Jong-chan Lee
    Jae-Hyeong Kim
    Jaihwan Kim
    Jin-Hyeok Hwang
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [29] Pharmacoethnicity of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Yoon Suk
    Lee, Jong-chan
    Kim, Jae-Hyeong
    Kim, Jaihwan
    Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [30] Cost-effectiveness analysis of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus folfirinox in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in china
    Cui, Jiujie
    Zhang, Xiaochen
    Qu, Shuli
    Wang, Liwei
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 691 - 697